Browse Source

doc: standardize references to userland

Change occurrences of "user-land" to "userland".

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/3192
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3189
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
v4.x
Martial 9 years ago
committed by James M Snell
parent
commit
d4399613b7
  1. 2
      CHANGELOG.md
  2. 6
      doc/tsc-meetings/io.js/2015-03-04.md

2
CHANGELOG.md

@ -2887,7 +2887,7 @@ https://iojs.org/api/tls.html
- Added async session storage events.
- Added async SNI callback.
- Added multi-key server support (for example, ECDSA+RSA server).
- Added optional callback to `checkServerIdentity` for manual certificate validation in user-land.
- Added optional callback to `checkServerIdentity` for manual certificate validation in userland.
- Added support for ECDSA/ECDHE cipher.
- Implemented TLS streams in C++, boosting their performance.
- Moved `createCredentials` to `tls` and renamed it to `createSecureContext`.

6
doc/tsc-meetings/io.js/2015-03-04.md

@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Discussion of how we should probably just add more Buffer methods to core.
Bert: there’s another aspect of this. At some point Node was really modern, but we’ve fallen behind. We can’t even get HTTP/2 or web sockets, we’re in trouble.
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to user-land code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to userland code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
Trevor: I would like the infrastructure for HTTP/2 to be similar to HTTP/1, with http-parser etc.
@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ Ben: is there any reason HTTP/2 couldn’t be done in pure JS?
Discussion of http-parser and current HTTP/1 implementation strategy and speed.
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some user-land ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some userland ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a user-land HTTP/2 module?
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a userland HTTP/2 module?
Discussion of how Fedor already has a SPDY implementation.

Loading…
Cancel
Save