lukechilds/node - node - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

19289 Commits

131 Branches

446 Tags

325 MiB

Tree: 018375cd4e

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Rich Trott	c2e838ee13	test: change common.expectsError() signature One downside to `common.expectsError()` is that it increases the abstractions people have to learn about in order to work with even simple tests. Whereas before, all they had to know about is `assert.throws()`, now they have to also know about `common.expectsError()`. This is very different (IMO) from `common.mustCall()` in that the latter has an intuitively understandable name, accepts arguments as one would expect, and (in most cases) doesn't actually require reading documentation or code to figure out what it's doing. With `common.expectsError()`, there's a fair bit of magic. Like, it's not obvious what the first argument would be. Or the second. Or the third. You just have to know. This PR changes the arguments accepted by `common.expectsError()` to a single settings object. Someone coming across this has a hope of understanding what's going on without reading source or docs: ```js const validatorFunction = common.expectsError({code: 'ELOOP', type: Error, message: 'foo'}); ``` This, by comparison, is harder to grok: ```js const validatorFunction = common.expectsError('ELOOP', Error, 'foo'); ``` And this is especially wat-inducing: ```js common.expectsError(undefined, undefined, 'looped doodad found'); ``` It's likely that only people who work with tests frequently can be expected to remember the three arguments and their order. By comparison, remembering that the error code is `code` and the message is `message` might be manageable. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11512 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Rich Trott	d0d02b6c88	test: use expectsError in require-invalid-package Use common.expectsError() in place of inline validation function in test-require-invalid-package. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11409 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Duy Le	283321e6e4	test: add test-require-invalid-package Add test for requiriing an invalid package path. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9903 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>	8 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Rich Trott

c2e838ee13

test: change common.expectsError() signature

One downside to `common.expectsError()` is that it increases the
abstractions people have to learn about in order to work with even
simple tests. Whereas before, all they had to know about is
`assert.throws()`, now they have to *also* know about
`common.expectsError()`. This is very different (IMO) from
`common.mustCall()` in that the latter has an intuitively understandable
name, accepts arguments as one would expect, and (in most cases) doesn't
actually require reading documentation or code to figure out what it's
doing. With `common.expectsError()`, there's a fair bit of magic. Like,
it's not obvious what the first argument would be. Or the second. Or the
third. You just have to know.

This PR changes the arguments accepted by `common.expectsError()` to a
single settings object. Someone coming across this has a hope of
understanding what's going on without reading source or docs:

```js
const validatorFunction = common.expectsError({code: 'ELOOP',
                                               type: Error,
                                               message: 'foo'});
```

This, by comparison, is harder to grok:

```js
const validatorFunction = common.expectsError('ELOOP',
                                               Error,
                                               'foo');
```

And this is especially wat-inducing:

```js
common.expectsError(undefined, undefined, 'looped doodad found');
```

It's likely that only people who work with tests frequently can be
expected to remember the three arguments and their order. By comparison,
remembering that the error code is `code` and the message is `message`
might be manageable.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11512
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

8 years ago

Rich Trott

d0d02b6c88

test: use expectsError in require-invalid-package

Use common.expectsError() in place of inline validation function in
test-require-invalid-package.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11409
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>

8 years ago

Duy Le

283321e6e4

test: add test-require-invalid-package

Add test for requiriing an invalid package path.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9903
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>

8 years ago

3 Commits (018375cd4e8381da0133bd2e1010e25386c072d2)