lukechilds/node - node - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Joyee Cheung	5e4545e18f	benchmark: add assert.deep[Strict]Equal benchmarks * Move numbers into configuration * Add buffer comparison benchmark * Add assert.deepStrictEqual benchmarks PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11092 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Rich Trott	d4061a6314	tools: replace custom ESLint rule with built-in ESLint 3.5.0 introduces a `no-restricted-properties` rule. Replace our custom `no-deepEqual` rule with this rule. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8478 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>	9 years ago
Rich Trott	a7335bd1f0	test,benchmark: use deepStrictEqual() In preparation for a lint rule that will enforce assert.deepStrictEqual() over assert.deepEqual(), change tests and benchmarks accordingly. For tests and benchmarks that are testing or benchmarking assert.deepEqual() itself, apply a comment to ignore the upcoming rule. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6213 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>	9 years ago
Andreas Madsen	15720fa25a	benchmark: fix configuation parameters The benchmark runner spawns new processes for each configuration. The specific configuration is transfered by process.argv. This means that the values have to be parsed. As of right now only numbers and strings are parsed correctly. However other values such as objects where used. This fixes the benchmarks that used non-string/number values and prevents future issues by asserting the type. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5177 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>	9 years ago
Claudio Rodriguez	63786227cc	assert: typed array deepequal performance fix assert.deepEqual: when actual and expected are typed arrays, wrap them in a new Buffer each to increase performance significantly. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/4330 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/4294 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>	9 years ago