lukechilds/node - node - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

17571 Commits

131 Branches

446 Tags

325 MiB

Tree: 0903dcf80c

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Trevor Norris	7e3a3c962f	async_hooks: initial async_hooks implementation Fill this commit messsage with more details about the change once all changes are rebased. * Add lib/async_hooks.js * Add JS methods to AsyncWrap for handling the async id stack * Introduce AsyncReset() so that JS functions can reset the id and again trigger the init hooks, allow AsyncWrap::Reset() to be called from JS via asyncReset(). * Add env variable to test additional things in test/common.js PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531 Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>	8 years ago
Trevor Norris	fe2df3b842	async_wrap,src: add GetAsyncId() method Allow handles to retrieve their own uid's by adding a new method on the FunctionTemplates. Implementation of these into all other classes will come in a future commit. Add the method AsyncWrap::GetAsyncId() to all inheriting class objects so the uid of the handle can be retrieved from JS. In all applicable locations, run ClearWrap() on the object holding the pointer so that it never points to invalid memory and make sure Wrap() is always run so the class pointer is correctly attached to the object and can be retrieved so GetAsyncId() can be run. In many places a class instance was not removing its own pointer from object() in the destructor. This left an invalid pointer in the JS object that could cause the application to segfault under certain conditions. Remove ClearWrap() from ReqWrap for continuity. The ReqWrap constructor was not the one to call Wrap(), so it shouldn't be the one to call ClearWrap(). Wrap() has been added to all constructors that inherit from AsyncWrap. Normally it's the child most class. Except in the case of HandleWrap. Which must be the constructor that runs Wrap() because the class pointer is retrieved for certain calls and because other child classes have multiple inheritance to pointer to the HandleWrap needs to be stored. ClearWrap() has been placed in all FunctionTemplate constructors so that no random values are returned when running getAsyncId(). ClearWrap() has also been placed in all class destructors, except in those that use MakeWeak() because the destructor will run during GC. Making the object() inaccessible. It could be simplified to where AsyncWrap sets the internal pointer, then if an inheriting class needs one of it's own it could set it again. But the inverse would need to be true also, where AsyncWrap then also runs ClearWeak. Unforunately because some of the handles are cleaned up during GC that's impossible. Also in the case of ReqWrap it runs Reset() in the destructor, making the object() inaccessible. Meaning, ClearWrap() must be run by the class that runs Wrap(). There's currently no generalized way of taking care of this across all instances of AsyncWrap. I'd prefer that there be checks in there for these things, but haven't found a way to place them that wouldn't be just as unreliable. Add test that checks all resources that can run getAsyncId(). Would like a way to enforce that any new classes that can also run getAsyncId() are tested, but don't have one. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531 Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>	8 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Trevor Norris

7e3a3c962f

async_hooks: initial async_hooks implementation

Fill this commit messsage with more details about the change once all
changes are rebased.

* Add lib/async_hooks.js

* Add JS methods to AsyncWrap for handling the async id stack

* Introduce AsyncReset() so that JS functions can reset the id and again
  trigger the init hooks, allow AsyncWrap::Reset() to be called from JS
  via asyncReset().

* Add env variable to test additional things in test/common.js

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>

8 years ago

Trevor Norris

fe2df3b842

async_wrap,src: add GetAsyncId() method

Allow handles to retrieve their own uid's by adding a new method on the
FunctionTemplates. Implementation of these into all other classes will
come in a future commit.

Add the method AsyncWrap::GetAsyncId() to all inheriting class objects
so the uid of the handle can be retrieved from JS.

In all applicable locations, run ClearWrap() on the object holding the
pointer so that it never points to invalid memory and make sure Wrap()
is always run so the class pointer is correctly attached to the object
and can be retrieved so GetAsyncId() can be run.

In many places a class instance was not removing its own pointer from
object() in the destructor. This left an invalid pointer in the JS
object that could cause the application to segfault under certain
conditions.

Remove ClearWrap() from ReqWrap for continuity. The ReqWrap constructor
was not the one to call Wrap(), so it shouldn't be the one to call
ClearWrap().

Wrap() has been added to all constructors that inherit from AsyncWrap.
Normally it's the child most class. Except in the case of HandleWrap.
Which must be the constructor that runs Wrap() because the class pointer
is retrieved for certain calls and because other child classes have
multiple inheritance to pointer to the HandleWrap needs to be stored.

ClearWrap() has been placed in all FunctionTemplate constructors so that
no random values are returned when running getAsyncId(). ClearWrap() has
also been placed in all class destructors, except in those that use
MakeWeak() because the destructor will run during GC. Making the
object() inaccessible.

It could be simplified to where AsyncWrap sets the internal pointer,
then if an inheriting class needs one of it's own it could set it again.
But the inverse would need to be true also, where AsyncWrap then also
runs ClearWeak. Unforunately because some of the handles are cleaned up
during GC that's impossible. Also in the case of ReqWrap it runs Reset()
in the destructor, making the object() inaccessible. Meaning,
ClearWrap() must be run by the class that runs Wrap(). There's currently
no generalized way of taking care of this across all instances of
AsyncWrap.

I'd prefer that there be checks in there for these things, but haven't
found a way to place them that wouldn't be just as unreliable.

Add test that checks all resources that can run getAsyncId(). Would like
a way to enforce that any new classes that can also run getAsyncId() are
tested, but don't have one.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>

8 years ago

2 Commits (0903dcf80cbe7c9e3566a6f104cda895e106949a)