lukechilds/node - node - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
matzavinos	7f55349079	net: convert to using internal/errors Covert lib/net.js over to using lib/internal/errors.js - Replace thrown errors in lib/net.js with errors from lib/internal/errors. The ERR_INVALID_OPT_VALUE error have been used in the Server.prototype.listen() method - Update tests according to the above modifications PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14782 Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>	7 years ago
Rich Trott	380929ec0c	test: remove common.noop This change removes `common.noop` from the Node.js internal testing common module. Over the last few weeks, I've grown to dislike the `common.noop` abstraction. First, new (and experienced) contributors are unaware of it and so it results in a large number of low-value nits on PRs. It also increases the number of things newcomers and infrequent contributors have to be aware of to be effective on the project. Second, it is confusing. Is it a singleton/property or a getter? Which should be expected? This can lead to subtle and hard-to-find bugs. (To my knowledge, none have landed on master. But I also think it's only a matter of time.) Third, the abstraction is low-value in my opinion. What does it really get us? A case could me made that it is without value at all. Lastly, and this is minor, but the abstraction is wordier than not using the abstraction. `common.noop` doesn't save anything over `() => {}`. So, I propose removing it. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12822 Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Aditya Anand	94eed0fb11	test: use dynamic port instead of common.PORT Remove common.PORT from, test-net-connect-immediate-destroy, test-net-options-lookup, test-net-connect-local-error, test-net-connect-handle-econnrefused, test-net-socket-destroy-twice, test-net-better-error-messages-port-hostname, test-net-localerror, to reduce possibility that a dynamic port used in another test will collide with common.PORT. Moved test-net-listen-shared-ports, test-net-better-error-messages-port from tests/parallel to test/sequential Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/12376 PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12473 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>	8 years ago
James M Snell	4f2e372716	test: add common.noop, default for common.mustCall() Export a new common.noop no-operation function for general use. Allow using common.mustCall() without a fn argument to simplify test cases. Replace various non-op functions throughout tests with common.noop PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12027 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Luca Maraschi	1ff6796083	test: added net.connect lookup type check Check the options passed to Socket.prototype.connect() to validate the type of the lookup property. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11873 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>	8 years ago