Solution is to manually add Attach() to OnConnection.
For client side it seems there is no Detach() being called after NS
resolution? Otherwise I would have removed it. That was another bug.
Note: We don't want to modify evnet's behavior to have on_connect called
directly when the socket is accepted. evnet needs to support SSL, and
on_connect is supposed to signal that the SSL connection is established. The
point here is that being "connected" and being "attached" to the event loop
are two different things. SSL stuff may be transmitted when a socket is not
"connected" but it must always be attached.
The problem was that Connection::on_close was calling Detach() directly
after executing the "disconnect" event. Since we had a boolean attach count,
this was leaving sockets detached even if they had reattached in during the
event.
* Added many asserts in http.cc and net.cc to ensure that sockets are
connected when they should be.
* Changed ObjectWrap to use a reference count instead of boolean attached_
value.
* Fixed similar bug in Timer.
This is a rather large refactor! Mostly for the better side. I've had to
remove some functionality like req.interrupt(). A lot of other work is left
messy or incomplete.
The constructor for TCP servers can no longer take a connection handler for
purely technical reasons. (The constructor for EventEmitter is implemented
in C++ but addListener is in javascript, and I don't want to make too many
C++ -> Javascript references.) Thus I introduce new constructor methods to
ease the creation of the servers:
node.tcp.createServer()
node.http.createServer()
These work almost the same as the old constructors.
In general we're working towards a future where no constructors are
publicly exposed or take arguments.
The HTTP events like "on_uri" are not yet using the event interface.
onMessage still is a constructor - but this will change soon.
This requires that onExit() is not called immediately upon receiving a
SIGCHLD. There could still be data in the pipez. So, instead just set a
flag and invoke the pipe watchers.
Sometimes one will not receive an EOF from pipes because the process was
killed by a SIGTERM, or something. If SIGCHLD has been recved but we are
getting EAGAIN, the pipez need to be closed too.
Ryan
Joshaven Potter