Export a new common.noop no-operation function for general use.
Allow using common.mustCall() without a fn argument to simplify
test cases.
Replace various non-op functions throughout tests with common.noop
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12027
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
This commit adds a mustNotCall() helper for testing. This provides
an alternative to using common.fail() as a callback, or creating
a callback function for the sole purpose of calling common.fail().
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11152
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
There are places in the code base where setTimeout() or
setInterval() are called with just a callback and no duration/interval.
The timers module will use a value of `1` in that situation.
An unspecified duration or interval can be confusing. Did the original
author forget to provide a value? Did they intend to use setImmediate()
or process.nextTick() instead of setTimeout()? And so on.
This change provides a duration or interval of `1` to all calls in the
codebase where it is missing. `parallel/test-timers.js` still tests the
situation where `setTimeout()` and `setInterval()` are called with
`undefined` and other non-numeric values for the duration/interval.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9472
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
A number of test files use IIFEs to separate distinct tests from
each other in the same file. The project has been moving toward
using block scopes and let/const in favor of IIFEs. This commit
moves IIFE tests to block scopes. Some additional cleanup such
as use of strictEqual() and common.mustCall() is also included.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7694
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Several changes:
* Soft-Deprecate Buffer() constructors
* Add `Buffer.from()`, `Buffer.alloc()`, and `Buffer.allocUnsafe()`
* Add `--zero-fill-buffers` command line option
* Add byteOffset and length to `new Buffer(arrayBuffer)` constructor
* buffer.fill('') previously had no effect, now zero-fills
* Update the docs
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/4682
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com>
common.js needs to be loaded in all tests so that there is checking
for variable leaks and possibly other things. However, it does not
need to be assigned to a variable if nothing in common.js is referred
to elsewhere in the test.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/4408
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Enable linting for the test directory. A number of changes was made so
all tests conform the current rules used by lib and src directories. The
only exception for tests is that unreachable (dead) code is allowed.
test-fs-non-number-arguments-throw had to be excluded from the changes
because of a weird issue on Windows CI.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/io.js/pull/1721
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
The copyright and license notice is already in the LICENSE file. There
is no justifiable reason to also require that it be included in every
file, since the individual files are not individually distributed except
as part of the entire package.
The tests did not agree with the test comments. Tests first and second
were both testing the !state.reading case. Now second tests the
state.reading && state.length case.
Fixesjoyent/node#5183
In cases where a stream may have data added to the read queue before the
user adds a 'readable' event, there is never any indication that it's
time to start reading.
True, there's already data there, which the user would get if they
checked However, as we use 'readable' event listening as the signal to
start the flow of data with a read(0) call internally, we ought to
trigger the same effect (ie, emitting a 'readable' event) even if the
'readable' listener is added after the first emission.
To avoid confusing weirdness, only the *first* 'readable' event listener
is granted this privileged status. After we've started the flow (or,
alerted the consumer that the flow has started) we don't need to start
it again. At that point, it's the consumer's responsibility to consume
the stream.
Closes#5141
`path.exists*` functions show a deprecation warning and call functions
from `fs`. They should be removed later.
test: fix references to `path.exists*` in tests
test fs: add test for `fs.exists` and `fs.existsSync`
doc: reflect moving `path.exists*` to `fs`
James M Snell
cjihrig
Rich Trott
Roman Reiss
isaacs
Fedor Indutny
Andrew Hart
Maciej Małecki
Andreas Madsen
Ben Noordhuis
Colton Baker
Ryan Dahl