SSL_get_SSL_CTX returns the SSL_CTX for an SSL. Previously the code
accessed |ssl->ctx| directly, but that's no longer possible with OpenSSL
1.1.0.
SSL_get_SSL_CTX exists all the way back to (at least) OpenSSL 0.9.8 and
so this change should be fully compatible.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8995
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor@indutny.com>
Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@ohtsu.org>
* var to const
* add check that expected error is ENOENT
* indexOf() to includes()
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8999
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
As the CTC grows and has representation from more time zones, we need to
embrace asynchronous decision making and rely less on the actual
meeting. This change is a proposal for that which, ironically, probably
has to be approved at a meeting.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8945
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@ohtsu.org>
Some commit links in the changelogs were pointing to incorrect/missing
shas.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8122
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
rval never existed, it was added as that in 077f9d7293
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9001
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9023
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8486
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ilkka Myller <ilkka.myller@nodefield.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
If there is a link in the headings, when the ToC is generated, that is
not properly linked and the square brackets are left as they are.
Even if we fix this, different parts of the heading will link to
different sections or even different pages. For example,
### What makes [`Buffer.allocUnsafe()`] and
[`Buffer.allocUnsafeSlow()`] "unsafe"?
will point to three different sections. `allocUnsafe` and
`allocUnsafeSlow` will link to their corresponding sections and all
other words actually link to the heading in the document. This could be
visually confusing.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9416
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9331
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9144
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Previously, we were relying on the output of gpg from git tag -v to
verify that the key selected by the releaser is the key that was used
to sign the tag. This output can change depending on the version of git
being used. Now, we just check that the output of git tag -v contains
the key selected.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8822
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8824
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
We now have multiple tap producers; just ignore all
files with the `.tap` extension.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9262
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
This makes yaml-ish parsers happy.
Note: gtest still seems to output the expected/result slightly
different making the full traceback less informational.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9262
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Produce a tap13-compatible output which makes it
simpler to parse. Output is still readable by
the jenkins tap plugin.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9262
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Git has been using my Long format fingerprint in the tagging messages,
this has been causing the release script to fail on my keys.
It would also be wise to be using the long format on keys based on some
attacks that hack been found in the wild around short keys.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9258
Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Original commit message:
[heap] Properly propagate allocated space during new space evacuaton in
MC
New space evaucation in MC supports, similar to scavenges, fall back
allocation in old space.
For new space evacuation we support sticky and non-sticky modes for
fallback. The sticky mode essentially removes the capability to allocate
in new space while the non-sticky mode only falls back for a single
allocation.
We use the non-sticky mode for allocations that are too large for a LAB
but should still go in new space. When such an allocation fails in new
space, we allocate in old space in non-sticky mode as we would still
like to reuse the remainder memory in new space. However, in such a case
we fail to properly report the space allocated in resulting in a missed
recorded slot.
BUG=chromium:641270
R=ulan@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2280943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38940}
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9192
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Notable changes:
* streams: Fix a regression introduced in v6.8.0 in readable stream
that caused unpipe to remove the wrong stream (Anna Henningsen)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9186
Since 2e568d9 there is a bug where unpiping a stream
from a readable stream that has `_readableState.pipesCount > 1`
will cause it to remove the first stream in the
`_.readableState.pipes` array no matter where in the list the
`dest` stream was.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9171
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Since 2e568d9 there is a bug where unpiping a stream
from a readable stream that has `_readableState.pipesCount > 1`
will cause it to remove the first stream in the
`_.readableState.pipes` array no matter where in the list the
`dest` stream was.
This patch corrects that problem.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9171
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9170
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9168
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
This release marks the transition of Node.js v6 into Long Term Support
(LTS) with the codename 'Boron'. The v6 release line now moves in to
"Active LTS" and will remain so until April 2018. After that time it
will move in to "Maintenance" until end of life in April 2019.
This is also a security release. All Node.js users should consult the
security release summary at
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/october-2016-security-releases/
for details on patched vulnerabilities.
Notable changes:
* crypto: Don't automatically attempt to load an OpenSSL configuration
file, from the `OPENSSL_CONF` environment variable or from the
default location for the current platform. Always triggering a
configuration file load attempt may allow an attacker to load
compromised OpenSSL configuration into a Node.js process if they are
able to place a file in a default location. (Fedor Indutny, Rod Vagg)
* node: Introduce the `process.release.lts` property, set to `"Boron"`.
This value is `"Argon"` for v4 LTS releases and `undefined` for all
other releases. (Rod Vagg)
* V8: Backport fix for CVE-2016-5172, an arbitrary memory read.
The parser in V8 mishandled scopes, potentially allowing an attacker
to obtain sensitive information from arbitrary memory locations via
crafted JavaScript code. This vulnerability would require an
attacker to be able to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in a
Node.js process. (Rod Vagg)
* **v8_inspector**: Generate a UUID for each execution of the
inspector. This provides additional security to prevent unauthorized
clients from connecting to the Node.js process via the v8_inspector
port when running with `--inspect`. Since the debugging protocol
allows extensive access to the internals of a running process, and
the execution of arbitrary code, it is important to limit
connections to authorized tools only. Vulnerability originally
reported by Jann Horn. (Eugene Ostroukhov)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node-private/pull/81
Original commit message:
Rewrite scopes of non-simple default arguments
Default parameters have additional declaration block scopes inserted
around them when something in the function scope calls eval. This
patch sets the parent scope of the expressions introduced due to
those defaults to the new block scope.
R=adamk
BUG=chromium:616386
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2077283004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37198}
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node-private/pull/80
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
* Add documentation for `--openssl-conf=file`.
* Fix openssl.cnf loading and OpenSSL init ordering
* Fix FIPS tests so `OPENSSL_CONF` is not longer usable but
`--openssl-conf` is
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node-private/pull/82
Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Do not load `openssl.cnf` file automatically, load the one provided by
`--openssl-config` at node startup.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node-private/pull/78
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
This define is not available in zlib prior to version 1.2.5.2. See
https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9110 for details. Workaround the
build breakage reported by casting away const in src/inspector_agent.cc
instead.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9122
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Commit 782620f added the define only when building with the bundled
zlib. Using a shared zlib results in build breakage:
../src/inspector_agent.cc:179:16: error: assigning to 'Bytef *' (aka 'unsigned char *') from incompatible type
'const uint8_t *' (aka 'const unsigned char *')
strm.next_in = PROTOCOL_JSON + 3;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9077
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
2a4b068aca introduced a regression in where checking
`instanceof` would fail for `Writable` subclasses inside the
subclass constructor, i.e. before `Writable()` was called.
Also, calling `null instanceof Writable` or
`undefined instanceof Writable` would fail due to accessing the
`_writableState` property of the target object.
This fixes these problems.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9088
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8834#issuecomment-253640692
Reviewed-By: Ilkka Myller <ilkka.myller@nodefield.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
This commit fixes a regression introduced in 0ed8839a27 that caused
additional queued immediate callbacks to be ignored if
`clearImmediate(immediate)` was called within the callback for
`immediate`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9086
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9084
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Make the internal `SyncWriteStream` a proper `stream.Writable`
subclass. This allows for quite a bit of simplification, since
`SyncWriteStream` predates the streams2/streams3 implementations.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8828
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8830
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
(backport info)
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9030
This commit adds a test for the killSignal option to spawnSync(),
and the other sync child process functions by extension.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
change assert.equal() to assert.strictEqual()
and use assert.strictEqual() for type validation
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8980
Reviewed-By: Ilkka Myller <ilkka.myller@nodefield.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Use `[Symbol.hasInstance]()` to return `true` when asking for
`new Duplex() instanceof Writable`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8834
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Calvin Metcalf <calvin.metcalf@gmail.com>
* Favor strictEqual
* Use const where appropriate
* Modernize where possible
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8468
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This commit attempts to fix one of the items in
https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/4641, which was to remove a
TODO the UDPWrap::OnSend function and share the code in that method with
StreamWrap::AfterWrite.
While looking into this addaleax pointed out that the implementations
for these two functions have diverged since the original comment
was added:
$ git log --pretty=short -u -L 357,357:src/udp_wrap.cc
$ git show cbd4033619cc45abdf878285c412bac9c3f36e4e:src/udp_wrap.cc |
grep -1 -A26 'UDPWrap::OnSend'
git show cbd4033619cc45abdf878285c412bac9c3f36e4e:src/stream_wrap.cc |
grep -A27 'void StreamWrap::AfterWrite'
Removing the TODO comment seems appropriate in this case.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9000
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>