|
|
@ -5,121 +5,113 @@ author: Pete Hunt |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of JavaScript MVC frameworks out there. Why did we |
|
|
|
build React, and why would you want to use it? |
|
|
|
build React and why would you want to use it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## React is not an MVC framework. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a library designed for building big UIs. The type where you have |
|
|
|
lots of reusable components that are handling events, presenting |
|
|
|
backend data, and accepting user input. The type where you have to |
|
|
|
integrate with legacy code, and support legacy browsers. |
|
|
|
React is a library for building large complex user interfaces with |
|
|
|
many reusable components that handle events, present backend data, |
|
|
|
and accept user input. At the same time, React was built to integrate |
|
|
|
with legacy code and to support older browsers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a conventional MVC application, you'd build the View with React |
|
|
|
(and maybe the Controller too, if you'd like). |
|
|
|
In the traditional MVC pattern, React is used to build the view. React |
|
|
|
lets you decide how to manage your data and business logic, be it |
|
|
|
outside of React components or within. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## React doesn't use templates. |
|
|
|
## React does not use templates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditionally, you'd create a set of templates with a template |
|
|
|
language or HTML directives to make a page dynamic. It's up to the |
|
|
|
designer of the template language or the author of the directives to |
|
|
|
provide the full set of abstractions you can use to build your |
|
|
|
front-end code. |
|
|
|
Traditionally, web application user interfaces are built using |
|
|
|
templates written in templating languages or HTML directives. These |
|
|
|
templates dictate the full set of abstractions that you are allowed to |
|
|
|
use to build the user interface. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
React's technique is to break your view down into small, composable |
|
|
|
and reusable **components**. These components provide a `render()` |
|
|
|
method which specifies how the component will generate its |
|
|
|
markup. `render()` can either return normal DOM elements (like |
|
|
|
`<div>`s) or can return other components. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that yes, we have JavaScript generating markup. But we |
|
|
|
think that this is an advantage over using templates for a few |
|
|
|
reasons: |
|
|
|
React approaches building user interfaces differently by breaking them |
|
|
|
down into smaller, composable and reusable **components**. Although |
|
|
|
this means we have JavaScript generating markup, we think this is an |
|
|
|
advantage over templates for a few reasons: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **JavaScript is a flexible, powerful programming language with the |
|
|
|
ability to build abstractions.** This is incredibly important in |
|
|
|
large applications. |
|
|
|
- "Logic" and "markup" are intimately tied, and are both part of the |
|
|
|
"presentation" layer, so we're unifying the presentation layer, |
|
|
|
not breaking separation of concerns. |
|
|
|
- Large projects usually don't use WYSIWYG editors for production |
|
|
|
code, so breaking apart markup from the code that creates it usually |
|
|
|
only introduces friction. |
|
|
|
- We've built a safe, convenient and fast way to compose markup and |
|
|
|
components using pure JavaScript. This means **no manual string |
|
|
|
concatenation** and limited surface area for XSS vulnerabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Reacting to changes |
|
|
|
ability to build abstractions.** This is incredibly important in |
|
|
|
large applications. |
|
|
|
- Logic and markup are intimately tied and are both part of the |
|
|
|
presentation layer. So we are unifying the presentation layer, not |
|
|
|
breaking separation of concerns. |
|
|
|
- Large projects usually do not use WYSIWYG editors for production |
|
|
|
code, so breaking apart markup from code creates friction without |
|
|
|
any real gain. |
|
|
|
- By baking an understanding of markup and content into JavaScript, |
|
|
|
there is **no manual string concatenation** and, thus, less surface |
|
|
|
area for XSS vulnerabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## React updates are dead simple. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
React really shines when your data changes over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a traditional JavaScript application you need to look at what data |
|
|
|
changed and imperatively make changes to the DOM to make them |
|
|
|
consistent. Even AngularJS, which provides a declarative interface via |
|
|
|
directives and data binding, still requires a linking function to |
|
|
|
manually update DOM nodes (remember: React components are quite |
|
|
|
flexible and analogous to AngularJS directives, not templates. In big |
|
|
|
apps you'll almost certainly need this level of expressive power). |
|
|
|
In a traditional JavaScript application, you need to look at what data |
|
|
|
changed and imperatively make changes to the DOM to keep it up-to-date. |
|
|
|
Even AngularJS, which provides a declarative interface via directives |
|
|
|
and data binding, requires a linking function to manually update DOM |
|
|
|
nodes. (Remember, React components are flexible and expressive, much |
|
|
|
like directives and less like templates in AngularJS.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
React takes a different approach. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When your component is first initialized, the `render()` method is |
|
|
|
called and a string of static HTML is inserted into the DOM. When your |
|
|
|
data changes, the `render()` method is called again. We diff the old |
|
|
|
return value from `render()` with the new one and determine the |
|
|
|
fastest way to update the DOM. So if only a single attribute on a |
|
|
|
single node has changed, that's all that React will update. |
|
|
|
data changes, the `render()` method is called again. We simply diff |
|
|
|
the old return value with the new one and determine the fastest way to |
|
|
|
update the DOM. So if only a single attribute on a single element has |
|
|
|
changed, that is all that React updates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We call this process **reconciliation**. Check out |
|
|
|
[this jsFiddle](http://jsfiddle.net/fv6RD/3/) for an example of |
|
|
|
reconciliation in action. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usually reconciliation will be faster than handwritten code, as React |
|
|
|
knows about the entire state of the page and can do cool tricks like |
|
|
|
batching reads and writes and picking the fastest subset of DOM |
|
|
|
Reconciliation will usually be faster than handwritten code because |
|
|
|
React knows about the entire state of the page and can do cool tricks |
|
|
|
like batching reads and writes and picking the fastest subset of DOM |
|
|
|
mutations to perform. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The way we're able to pull this off is by constructing a very fast, |
|
|
|
The way we are able to pull this off is by constructing a very fast, |
|
|
|
lightweight representation of the DOM which knows which parts are |
|
|
|
dirtied and which parts are clean. That is, **the data returned from |
|
|
|
`render()` isn't a string and isn't a real DOM node, it's just a |
|
|
|
lightweight description of what the DOM should look like**. |
|
|
|
dirtied and which parts are clean. **The data returned from `render()` |
|
|
|
is neither a string nor a DOM node -- it is a lightweight description |
|
|
|
of what the DOM should look like.** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because this re-render is so fast (on the order of 1ms for TodoMVC), |
|
|
|
we don't need the end user to explicitly specify data bindings. We've |
|
|
|
found that this is an easy way to build apps. It's a lot like the |
|
|
|
early days of the dynamic web. Back then you wrote simple |
|
|
|
presentational code and when your data changed you simply refreshed |
|
|
|
the page. Today, React makes that "refresh" very fast and lightweight, |
|
|
|
and only changes the parts of the markup that need to be changed. |
|
|
|
we do not need the end user to explicitly specify data bindings. We |
|
|
|
have found this to be an easier way to build apps. It is a lot like |
|
|
|
the early days of the dynamic web. Back then, you wrote simple |
|
|
|
presentational code and when your data changed, you simply refreshed |
|
|
|
the page. Today, React makes that refresh very fast and lightweight, |
|
|
|
and only the parts of the markup that need to be changed are changed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other framework we've seen can support this easily, since it would |
|
|
|
have to be built from the ground up to have very little coupling with |
|
|
|
the DOM. |
|
|
|
No other framework that we have seen does this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Not just for HTML components in the browser |
|
|
|
## HTML is just the beginning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since React makes so few assumptions about its environment, we can do |
|
|
|
some pretty cool things with it: |
|
|
|
Since React makes very few assumptions about its environment, we can |
|
|
|
do some pretty cool things with it: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Facebook.com has dynamic charts that render to `<canvas>` instead of |
|
|
|
HTML |
|
|
|
- Facebook has dynamic charts that render to `<canvas>` instead of |
|
|
|
HTML. |
|
|
|
- Instagram is a "single page" web app built entirely with React and |
|
|
|
`Backbone.Router`. Designers regularly contribute React code with |
|
|
|
JSX. |
|
|
|
- We've built an internal prototype that runs React apps in a web |
|
|
|
worker |
|
|
|
- We have built an internal prototype that runs React apps in a web |
|
|
|
worker. |
|
|
|
- You can run React |
|
|
|
[on the server](http://github.com/petehunt/react-server-rendering) |
|
|
|
for SEO, performance, code sharing and overall flexibility. |
|
|
|
- Events behave in a consistent, standards-compliant way in all |
|
|
|
browsers (including IE8) and automatically use |
|
|
|
[event delegation](http://davidwalsh.name/event-delegate) |
|
|
|
[event delegation](http://davidwalsh.name/event-delegate). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head on over to |
|
|
|
[facebook.github.io/react](http://facebook.github.io/react) to check |
|
|
|
out what we've built. Our documentation is geared towards building |
|
|
|
apps with the framework, but if you're interested in the |
|
|
|
out what we have built. Our documentation is geared towards building |
|
|
|
apps with the framework, but if you are interested in the |
|
|
|
nuts-and-bolts |
|
|
|
[get in touch](http://facebook.github.io/react/support.html) with us! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|