From 352c3ff01f437de2441533313bb1feb2c3f87414 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Abramov <dan.abramov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:24:10 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix example

---
 content/docs/hooks-faq.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/docs/hooks-faq.md b/content/docs/hooks-faq.md
index 0540031b..9016fa7f 100644
--- a/content/docs/hooks-faq.md
+++ b/content/docs/hooks-faq.md
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ Yes. See [conditionally firing an effect](/docs/hooks-reference.html#conditional
 Generally speaking, no.
 
 ```js{3,8}
-function Example() {
+function Example({ someProp }) {
   function doSomething() {
     console.log(someProp);
   }
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ function Example() {
 It's difficult to remember which props or state are used by functions outside of the effect. This is why **usually you'll want to declare functions needed by an effect *inside* of it.** Then it's easy to see what values from the component scope that effect depends on:
 
 ```js{4,8}
-function Example() {
+function Example({ someProp }) {
   useEffect(() => {
     function doSomething() {
       console.log(someProp);