* Clarify language in components-and-props.md
This is a nit for a few reasons:
- The point that extracting a component that "is complex enough on its own" means that it's not necessarily reusable.
- Extracting the components listed in the same sentence (e.g. App) are not necessarily reusable.
- This ends the section "Extracting Components" with a reference to extraction instead of re-usability.
- This delimits extracting into a separate component from creating a re-usable component.
* Update components-and-props.md
* Update components-and-props.md
* Add ajax with hooks example
* Add comment about empty deps in useEffect hook
* grammar
Co-authored-by: Alex Krolick <alexkrolick@users.noreply.github.com>
Having the information that the plugin is already installed by default after the installation instructions is probably wasting a lot of people's time. Moving it up probably avoids multiple installs of the plugin.
* Clarify preferred "props default to true" expr
The current text is ambiguous without reading further into the paragraph -- until I re-read this text, I was trying to avoid both types of syntax because it seemed to imply that it wans't recommended (eg "props default to true" --> "we don't recommend using this").
* Update jsx-in-depth.md
Co-authored-by: Sunil Pai <threepointone@oculus.com>
The ternary syntax using parenthesis was an unconventional prettier invention, going out of its way to format react ternaries differently from normal ternaries (if i remember correctly, because vim users had trouble re-formating without a mouse). If they made the right decision or not is one thing, but the additional noise could mislead beginners here, thinking they have to add more characters to make a simple 2-slot ternary, or that it is a "react thing".
Since persist() is referred to in the doc as a method for disabling event pooling, that must mean it's part of the SyntheticEvent API.
I'm proposing to state it more explicitly so that there's no doubt for newcomers like me whether it is the SyntheticEvent or the actual JS event that has the method.
Changed Line 94- You can't use Hooks *inside* of a class component, but you can definitely mix classes and function components with Hooks in a single tree.
to
"You can't use Hooks *inside* a class component, but you can definitely mix classes and function components with Hooks in a single tree. "
* Documentation error
Line 290 - ". However, instead we recommend to split state into multiple state variables based on which values tend to change together."
Both 'however' and 'instead' are contrasting words and only one of them should be used.
Either "Instead we recommend to split state into multiple state variables based on which values tend to change together." OR "However, we recommend to split state into multiple state variables based on which values tend to change together."
Updated the sentence.
* Updated 'however' to 'instead'
Line 290 updated to -
Instead, **we recommend to split state into multiple state variables based on which values tend to change together.**
* Update hooks-faq.md
Co-authored-by: Sunil Pai <threepointone@fb.com>
There's a line in the document that says:
"When it previously rendered, the `Calculator` has specified that"
The sentence is using a present tense verb ("has"), but the statement is in the past tense.
I think "When it previously rendered, the `Calculator` had specified that" would be correct.
Rafaela Ferro
Elia Maino
shyamsn00
Siju Samson
⚡ Saif Al Falah
Cory House
Ricky
Siju Samson
Viral-Inc
Jack Hsu
a-oz
Arif Zuhairi
mattc41190
Dan Abramov
Gordey
Sebastian Silbermann
Nhan Doan
Ruphaa Ganesh
Esteban Luchsinger
Vishal Jagtap
Jonathan Chhabra
David Beitey
JuanMa
Mendel Bakaleynik
Andy
Paul Henschel
Stephanie
Toru Kobayashi
Sai Ram Kunala
Amandeep Singh
Carl A Lewis
Raj Nigam
shawn
Sunil Pai
Myron Yeung
Gisli Nielsen
Himanshu Pathak
Abel Regalado
tiffanymonroe
corinty
Vincent
Rajinder Yadav
Steve Dodier-Lazaro
Arshita Kakkar
Conrad Beach
Tom Beckenhauer
Juan M. Rinaudo