12 KiB
title | author |
---|---|
Update on Async Rendering | [bvaughn] |
For the past few months, the React team has been working on asynchronous rendering, and we are very excited about the new features it enables.
Along the way, we've learned that some of our legacy component lifecycles tend to encourage unsafe coding practices. They are:
componentWillMount
componentWillReceiveProps
componentWillUpdate
These lifecycle methods have often been misunderstood and subtly misused; furthermore, we anticipate that these potential problems may be more prominent with async rendering. Because of this, we are adding an "UNSAFE_" prefix to these lifecycles in a future release.
React follows semantic versioning, so the migration path will be gradual:
- 16.3: Introduce aliases for the unsafe lifecycles,
UNSAFE_componentWillMount
,UNSAFE_componentWillReceiveProps
, andUNSAFE_componentWillUpdate
. (Both the old lifecycle names and the new aliases will work in this release.) - 16.x: Enable deprecation warning for
componentWillMount
,componentWillReceiveProps
, andcomponentWillUpdate
. (Both the old lifecycle names and the new aliases will work in this release.) - 17.0: Remove
componentWillMount
,componentWillReceiveProps
, andcomponentWillUpdate
. (Only the new "UNSAFE_" lifecycle names will work in this release.)
In this post, we will explore some of the potential capabilities of async rendering, and we'll outline a migration plan for components that rely on these legacy lifecycles.
Updating class components
If you're an application developer, you don't have to do anything about the legacy methods yet. The primary purpose of the upcoming version 16.3 is to enable open source project maintainers to update their libraries in advance of any deprecation warnings. Those warnings will be enabled with a future 16.x release.
However, if you'd like to start using the new component API (or if you're a maintainer looking to update your library in advance) here are a few examples that we hope will help you to start thinking about components a bit differently. Over time, we plan to add additional "recipes" to our documentation that show how to perform common tasks in a way that avoids the problematic lifecycles.
Before we begin, here's a quick overview of the lifecycle changes planned for version 16.3:
- We are adding the following lifecycle aliases:
UNSAFE_componentWillMount
,UNSAFE_componentWillReceiveProps
, andUNSAFE_componentWillUpdate
. (Both the old lifecycle names and the new aliases will be supported.) - We are introducing two new lifecycles, static
getDerivedStateFromProps
andgetSnapshotBeforeUpdate
:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/new-lifecycles-overview.js
The new static getSnapshotBeforeUpdate
lifecycle is invoked after a component is instantiated as well as when it receives new props. It should return an object to update state
, or null
to indicate that the new props
do not require any state
updates.
The new getSnapshotBeforeUpdate
lifecycle gets called right before mutations are made (e.g. before the DOM is updated). The return value for this lifecycle will be passed as the third parameter to componentDidUpdate
.
We'll look at examples of how both of these lifecycles can be used below.
Note
For brevity, the examples below are written using the experimental class properties transform, but the same migration strategies apply without it.
Initializing state
This example shows a component with setState
calls inside of componentWillMount
:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/initializing-state-before.js
The simplest refactor for this type of component is to move state initialization to the constructor or to a property initializer, like so:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/initializing-state-after.js
Fetching external data
Here is an example of a component that uses componentWillMount
to fetch external data:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/fetching-external-data-before.js
The above code is problematic for both server rendering (where the external data won't be used) and the upcoming async rendering mode (where the request might be initiated multiple times).
The recommended upgrade path for most use cases is to move data-fetching into componentDidMount
:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/fetching-external-data-after.js
There is a common misconception that fetching in componentWillMount
lets you avoid the first empty rendering state. In practice this was never true because React has always executed render
immediately after componentWillMount
. If the data is not available by the time componentWillMount
fires, the first render
will still show a loading state regardless of where you initiate the fetch. This is why moving the fetch to componentDidMount
has no perceptible effect in the vast majority of cases.
Note
Some advanced use-cases (e.g. libraries like Relay) may want to experiment with eagerly prefetching async data. An example of how this can be done is available here.
Adding event listeners (or subscriptions)
Here is an example of a component that subscribes to an external event dispatcher when mounting:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/adding-event-listeners-before.js
Unfortunately, this can cause memory leaks for server rendering (where componentWillUnmount
will never be called) and async rendering (where rendering might be interrupted before it completes, causing componentWillUnmount
not to be called).
People often assume that componentWillMount
and componentWillUnmount
are always paired, but that is not guaranteed. Only once componentDidMount
has been called does React guarantee that componentWillUnmount
will later be called for clean up.
For this reason, the recommended way to add listeners/subscriptions is to use the componentDidMount
lifecycle:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/adding-event-listeners-after.js
Note
Although the pattern above is slightly more verbose, it has an added benefit of deferring the subscription creation until after the component has rendered, reducing the amount of time in the critical render path. In the near future, React may include more tools to reduce code complexity for data fetching cases like this.
Note
Sometimes it is important to update subscriptions in response to property changes. If you're using a library like Redux or MobX, the library's container component should handle this for you. If you're authoring such a library, we suggest using a technique like the one shown here.
Updating state
based on props
Here is an example of a component that uses the legacy componentWillReceiveProps
lifecycle to update state
based on new props
values:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/updating-state-from-props-before.js
Although the above code is not problematic in itself, the componentWillReceiveProps
lifecycle is often mis-used in ways that do present problems. Because of this, the method has been deprecated.
As of version 16.3, the recommended way to update state
in response to props
changes is with the new static getDerivedStateFromProps
lifecycle. (That lifecycle is called when a component is created and each time it receives new props.):
embed:update-on-async-rendering/updating-state-from-props-after.js
Note
The
react-lifecycles-compat
polyfill enables this new lifecycle to be used with older versions of React as well. Learn more about how to use it below.
Invoking external callbacks
Here is an example of a component that calls an external function when its internal state changes:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/invoking-external-callbacks-before.js
Sometimes people use componentWillUpdate
out of a misplaced fear that by the time componentDidUpdate
fires, it is "too late" to update the state of other components. This is not the case. React ensures that any setState
calls that happen during componentDidMount
and componentDidUpdate
are flushed before the user sees the updated UI. In general, it is better to avoid cascading updates like this, but in some cases they are necessary (for example, if you need to position a tooltip after measuring the rendered DOM element).
Either way, it is unsafe to use componentWillUpdate
for this purpose in async mode, because the external callback might get called multiple times for a single update. Instead, the componentDidUpdate
lifecycle should be used since it is guaranteed to be invoked only once per update:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/invoking-external-callbacks-after.js
Updating external data when props
change
Here is an example of a component that fetches external data based on props
values:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/updating-external-data-when-props-change-before.js
The recommended upgrade path for this component is to move data-updates into componentDidUpdate
. You can also use the new getDerivedStateFromProps
lifecycle to clear stale data before rendering the new props:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/updating-external-data-when-props-change-after.js
Note
If you're using an HTTP library that supports cancellation, like axios, then it's simple to cancel an in-progress request when unmounting. For native Promises, you can use an approach like the one shown here.
Reading DOM properties before an update
Here is an example of a component that reads a property from the DOM before an update in order to maintain scroll position within a list:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/react-dom-properties-before-update-before.js
In the above example, componentWillUpdate
is used to read the DOM property. However with async rendering, there may be delays between "render" phase lifecycles (like componentWillUpdate
and render
) and "commit" phase lifecycles (like componentDidUpdate
). A user might continue scrolling during this delay, in which case the position value read from componentWillUpdate
will be stale.
The solution to this problem is to use the new "commit" phase lifecycle, getSnapshotBeforeUpdate
. This method gets called immediately before mutations are made (e.g. before the DOM is updated). It can return a value for React to pass as a parameter to componentDidUpdate
, which gets called immediately after mutations.
The two lifecycles can be used together like this:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/react-dom-properties-before-update-after.js
Other scenarios
While we tried to cover the most common use cases in this post, we recognize that we might have missed some of them. If you are using componentWillMount
, componentWillUpdate
, or componentWillReceiveProps
in ways that aren't covered by this blog post, and aren't sure how to migrate off these legacy lifecycles, please file a new issue against our documentation with your code examples and as much background information as you can provide. We will update this document with new alternative patterns as they come up.
Open source project maintainers
Open source maintainers might be wondering what these changes mean for shared components. If you implement the above suggestions, what happens with components that depend on the new static getDerivedStateFromProps
lifecycle? Do you also have to release a new major version and drop compatibility for React 16.2 and older?
Fortunately, you do not!
In support of version 16.3, we've also created a new NPM package, react-lifecycles-compat
. This package polyfills components so that the new getDerivedStateFromProps
lifecycle will also work with older versions of React (0.14.9+).
To use this polyfill, first add it as a dependency to your library:
# Yarn
yarn add react-lifecycles-compat
# NPM
npm install react-lifecycles-compat --save
Next, update your components to use the new static lifecycle, getDerivedStateFromProps
, as described above.
Lastly, use the polyfill to make your component backwards compatible with older versions of React:
embed:update-on-async-rendering/using-react-lifecycles-compat.js