From 942160ba6edb8536c8f673befd8974d1819a1d91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Bostock Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 14:19:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix links. --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 6d9fefe..56526b5 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ This is an experimental project. You definitely shouldn't try and use it, yet. Right now, you have a few different options if you want to create a bundle out of your ES6 modules: -* The best option, in terms of performance, size of the resulting bundle, and accurate representation of ES6 module semantics, is to use [esperanto](esperantojs.org). It's used by [ractive.js](ractivejs.org), [moment.js](http://momentjs.com/), Facebook's [immutable.js](https://github.com/facebook/immutable-js), the jQuery Foundation's [pointer events polyfill](https://github.com/jquery/PEP), [Ember CLI](http://www.ember-cli.com/) and a bunch of other libraries and apps +* The best option, in terms of performance, size of the resulting bundle, and accurate representation of ES6 module semantics, is to use [esperanto](http://esperantojs.org). It's used by [ractive.js](http://ractivejs.org), [moment.js](http://momentjs.com/), Facebook's [immutable.js](https://github.com/facebook/immutable-js), the jQuery Foundation's [pointer events polyfill](https://github.com/jquery/PEP), [Ember CLI](http://www.ember-cli.com/) and a bunch of other libraries and apps * You could use [jspm](http://jspm.io/), which combines a module bundler with a loader and a package manager * Or you could use [browserify](http://browserify.org/) or [webpack](http://webpack.github.io/), transpiling your modules into CommonJS along the way