Instead of deleting the channels we will simple mark them as `CLOSED` from now
on. This is needed for some of the other tables not to end up with dangling
references that would otherwise survive the channel lifetime, e.g., forwards
and transactions.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
When in this state, we send a canned error "Awaiting unilateral close".
We enter this both when we drop to chain, and when we're trying to get
them to drop to chain due to option_data_loss_protect.
As this state (unlike channel errors) is saved to the database, it means
we will *never* talk to a peer again in this state, so they can't
confuse us.
Since we set this state in channel_fail_permanent() (which is the only
place we call drop_to_chain for a unilateral close), we don't need to
save to the db: channel_set_state() does that for us.
This state change has a subtle effect: we return WIRE_UNKNOWN_NEXT_PEER
instead of WIRE_TEMPORARY_CHANNEL_FAILURE as soon as we get a failure
with a peer. To provoke a temporary failure in test_pay_disconnect we
take the node offline.
Reported-by: Christian Decker @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The billboard is now far more useful to tell what's going on, and this
gets us closer to a state == owner mapping.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And now we can finally do the db upgrade to remove any OPENINGD
channels once, since we never put them back.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We derive the seed from this, so it needs to be unique, but using
rowid forced us to put the channel into the db early, before it
was ready.
Instead, use a counter to ensure uniqueness, initialized when we load
existing peers. This doesn't need to touch the database at all.
As we now have only two places where the channel is committed (the
funder and fundee paths), so we create a new explicit
'wallet_channel_insert()' function: 'wallet_channel_save()' now just
updates.
Note that this also fixes some weirdness in
wallet_channels_load_active: we strangely avoided loading channels in
CLOSINGD_COMPLETE (which fortunately was a transient state, so
unlikely anyone hit this). Note that since the lines above already
delete all the OPENINGD channels, we now simply load them all.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Much like the database; peer contains id, address, channel contains
per-channel information. Where we create a channel, we always create
the peer too.
For the moment, peer->log and channel->log coexist side-by-side, to
reduce some of the churn.
Note that this changes the API to dev-forget-channel: if we have more
than one channel, we insist they specify the short-channel-id.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now the flow is much simpler from a lightningd POV:
1. If we want to connect to a peer, just send gossipd `gossipctl_reach_peer`.
2. Every new peer, gossipd hands up to lightningd, with global/local features
and the peer fd and a gossip fd using `gossip_peer_connected`
3. If lightningd doesn't want it, it just hands the peerfd and global/local
features back to gossipd using `gossipctl_handle_peer`
4. If a peer sends a non-gossip msg (eg `open_channel`) the gossipd sends
it up using `gossip_peer_nongossip`.
5. If lightningd wants to fund a channel, it simply calls `release_channel`.
Notes:
* There's no more "unique_id": we use the peer id.
* For the moment, we don't ask gossipd when we're told to list peers, so
connected peers without a channel don't appear in the JSON getpeers API.
* We add a `gossipctl_peer_addrhint` for the moment, so you can connect to
a specific ip/port, but using other sources is a TODO.
* We now (correctly) only give up on reaching a peer after we exchange init
messages, which changes the test_disconnect case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have a race where we start onchaind, but state is unchanged, so checks
like peer_control.c's:
peer_ready = (peer->owner && peer->state == CHANNELD_AWAITING_LOCKIN);
if (!peer_ready) {
log_unusual(peer->log,
"Funding tx confirmed, but peer state %s %s",
peer_state_name(peer->state),
peer->owner ? peer->owner->name : "unowned");
} else {
subd_send_msg(peer->owner,
take(towire_channel_funding_locked(peer,
peer->scid)));
}
Can send to the wrong daemon.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a transitional state, while we're waiting to see the
closing tx onchain (which is To Be Implemented).
The simplest way to do re-transmission is to re-use closingd, and just
disallow any updates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We keep the scriptpubkey to send until after a commitment_signed (or,
in the corner case, if there's no pending commitment). When we
receive a shutdown from the peer, we pass it up to the master.
It's up to the master not to add any more HTLCs, which works because
we move from CHANNELD_NORMAL to CHANNELD_SHUTTING_DOWN.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means there's no GETTING_HSMFD state at all any more. We
temporarily play games with the hsm fd; those will go away once we're
done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means there's no GETTING_SIG_FROM_HSM state at all any more. We
temporarily play games with the hsm fd; those will go away once we're
done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead, send it the funding_signed message; it can watch, save to
database, and send it.
Now the openingd fundee path is a simple request and response, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. We explicitly assert what state we're coming from, to make transitions
clearer.
2. Every transition has a state, even between owners while waiting for HSM.
3. Explictly step though getting the HSM signature on the funding tx
before starting channeld, rather than doing it in parallel: makes
states clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently create a peer struct, then complete handshake to find out
who it is. This means we have a half-formed peer, and worse: if it's
a reconnect we get two peers the same.
Add an explicit 'struct connection' for the handshake phase, and
construct a 'struct peer' once that's done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell