Quite a few of the things in the LightningNode class are tailored to their use
in the c-lightning tests, so I decided to split those customizations out into
a sub-class, and adding one more fixture that just serves the class. This
allows us to override the LightningNode implementation in our own tests, while
still having sane defaults for other users.
We were relying heavily on NodeFactory to do some magic before instantiating
the Node with rpc and daemon initialized, that meant that we'd have to replace
all 3 classes when customizing the node to our needs. Moving that
initialization into the node itself means that the LightningNode class now can
be swapped out and customized, without having to wire everything else through.
`DEVELOPER=1` assumes that the binary has been compiled with developer set to
true, which might not be the case for plugin developers. Setting this to 0 by
default has no effect in c-lightning since we always at least set it in
`config.vars` but may prevent some issues outside.
We'll rewrite the tests to use this infrastructure in the next commit.
Changelog-Added: The new `pyln-testing` package now contains the testing infrastructure so it can be reused to test against c-lighting in external projects
This should not affect any consumer of the API since we just shift the actual
implementation from one side to the other, and keep aliases in place so
scripts don't break.
We also bump the version number from 0.0.7.3 to 0.7.4 which allows us to be in
sync with c-lightning itself, and remove the superfluous `0` in front.
This takes a dbid, a "depth" (how many points to dump), the hsm_secret
path, and a potential password to dump informations about all
commitments until the depth.
Co-Authored-By: Sjors Provoost <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
The 'rpc_command' hook allows a plugin to take over any RPC command.
It sends the complete JSONRPC request to the plugin, which can then respond
with :
- {'continue'}: executes the command normally
- {'replace': {a_jsonrpc_request}}: replaces the request made
- {'return': {'result': {}}}: send a custom response
- {'return': {'error': {}}}: send a custom error
This way, a plugin can modify (/reimplement) or restrict the usage of
any of `lightningd`'s commands.
Changelog-Added: Plugin: A new plugin hook, `rpc_command` allows a plugin to take over `lightningd` for any RPC command.
Even if it is on startup only once ...
Like @bitcoin-software indicated the expected UX should be in
line with what a user expects the software will do
so we should not dns if we say so with a flag that suggest that.
Changelog-Fixed: We disable all dns even on startup the scan for bogus dns servers, if --always-use-proxy is set true
Signed-off-by: Saibato <saibato.naga@pm.me>
The flat feature PR changes the rules so these are OK to propagate.
That makes sense: the unsupported features means there's something
unsupported about the *node* or *channel*, not the msg itself
(for that we'd use a different message type).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When doing the random walk through the channel, we now add the fees
(both the base and the proportional one) for that channel in addition to
the cltv delta.
Changelog-Added: Payment amount fuzzing is restored, but through shadow routing.
Since the `CHANGELOG.md` file is a major source for merge conflicts I decided
to build a tiny tool that generates the entries for the changelog
automatically from the commit messages.
Reduce test_feerate_stress iterations, and simply don't run
test_pay_retry under VALGRIND with SLOW_MACHINE at all.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This prevents a gratuitous lookup of we get a late channel_announce,
but even better, it suppresses the "bad gossip" messages in case of
a late channel_update, which have plagued Travis (especially since we
got aggressive in pushing our own updates).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It currently works because we inject it so fast that it's still doing the
txout lookup, but that's about to change.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
A long time ago (93dcd5fed7), I
simplified the htlc reload code so it adjusted the amounts for HTLCs
in id order. As we presumably allowed them to be added in that order,
this avoided special-casing overflow (which was about to deliberately
be made harder by the new amount_msat code).
Unfortunately, htlc id order is not canonical, since htlc ids are
assigned consecutively in both directions! Concretely, we can have two HTLCs:
HTLC #0 LOCAL->REMOTE: 500,000,000 msat, state RCVD_REMOVE_REVOCATION
HTLC #0 REMOTE->LOCAL: 10,000 msat, state SENT_ADD_COMMIT
On a new remote-funded channel, in which we have 0 balance, these
commits *only* work in this order. Sorting by HTLC ID is not enough!
In fact, we'd have to worry about redemption order as well, as that
matters.
So, regretfully, we offset the balances halfway to UINT64_MAX, then check
they didn't underflow at the end. This loses us this one sanity check,
but that's probably OK.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's less helpful, sure, but it's far better than someone
sending me their output and leaking this information.
Fixes: #3242
Reported-by: @JavierRSobrino
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If you're replaying or syncing with the blockchain, show that error
instead of 'cannot afford', in the case of not having enough utxos
to pay for a transaction. This is the 'more correct' error to show, as
there's a chance that the funds you're expecting to spend are in the
portion of the blockchain that hasn't been synced yet.
This is a better fix than doing it manually, which turned out
to do it in the wrong order (node_announcement followed by
channel_announcement) anyway.
Should fix many "Bad gossip" messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to change it so we always send our local messages, which
breaks this test. Add a new node which doesn't have any local
messages, so the test works correctly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Sometimes the l3 seeker asks for scids, and the reply contains the
channel which is then closed by the time it checks, so it considers
the updates bad gossip.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I was wondering why TAGS was missing some functions, and finally
tracked it down: PRINTF_FMT() confuses etags if it's at the start
of a function, and it ignores the rest of the file.
So we put PRINTF_FMT at the end, but that doesn't work for
*definitions*, only *declarations*. So we remove it from definitions
and add gratuitous declarations in the few static places.1
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I'm not sure what went wrong, but the first RC I cut had some trouble
with the tag being picked up with `git describe`, I think it was missing
a 'tag message'. I'm not sure what caused this.
This commit breaks up the first git tag procedure to have the releaser
verify that the tag command works as intended (and sensitizes them to
checking this for subsequent release cuts, if necessary)
lisa neigut
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
darosior
Saibato
gorazdko
Sebastian Geisler