We had occasional failures, because the fuzz could overwhelm the difference
in routes. Increasing the amount to 2,000,000 millisatoshis makes the
riskfactor 53msat (2000000 * 14 * 10 / 5259600) which is always greater
than the worst-case fuzz of 5% on the fee of 1002msat.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I got a spurious failure because the final node gave a CLTV error and
so it decided to use a different channel. It should probably handle
this corner case better, but meanwhile make the test robust.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It was waiting for a remote channel, but not for all the interesting
channels we want to check. It can sometimes happen that further away
channels are added before closer ones are added, depending on
propagation path, flush timers and bitcoind poll timers. This now just
checks for all channels, which also reduces the ambiguity of whether
we selected a path solely because we were lacking alternatives.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Travis timed out.
Waiting for three fundchannel commands depends on the bitcoind polling
interval (30 seconds), and then waiting for gossip propagation
requires two propagation intervals (120 seconds).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Up until now, riskfactor was useless due to implementation bugs, and
also the default setting is wrong (too low to have an effect on
reasonable payment scenarios).
Let's simplify the definition (by assuming that P(failure) of a node
is 1), to make it a simple percentage. I examined the current network
fees to see what would work, and under this definition, a default of
10 seems reasonable (equivalent to 1000 under the old definition).
It is *this* change which finally fixes our test case! The riskfactor
is now 40msat (1500000 * 14 * 10 / 5259600 = 39.9), comparable with
worst-case fuzz is 50msat (1001 * 0.05 = 50).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The test sometimes passes: our routing logic always chooses between
the shorter of two equal-cost routes (because we compare best with <
not <=).
By adding another hop, we add more noise, and by making the alternate
route fee 0 we provide the worst case.
But to be fair, we make the amount of the payment ~50c (15,000,000
msat), and increase our cltv-delay to 14 and fee-base 1000 to match
mainnet. The final patch shows the effect of this choice.
Otherwise our risk penalty is completely in the noise on
mainnet which has the vast majority of fees set at 1000msat + 1ppm.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the direct cause of the failure of the original
test_pay_direct test and it makes sense: invoice routehints may not be
necessary, so try without them *first* rather than last.
We didn't mention the use of routehints in CHANGELOG at all yet, so
do that now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It is suddenly timing out a lot and is breaking master, so we
temporarily disable it until it is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
So add a new 'strategy' field. This makes it clearer what is going
on, currently one of:
* "Initial attempt"
* "Excluded channel <scid>"
* "Removed route hint"
* "Excluded expensive channel <scid>"
* "Excluded delaying channel <scid>"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We sanitize the routes: firstly, we assume appending so eliminate the
first hop if the route points straight to us. Secondly, eliminate empty
hints. Thirdly, trim overlong hints.
Then we just use the first route hint.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently only used by gossipd for channel elimination.
Also print them in canonical form (/[01]), so tests need to be
changed.
Suggested-by: @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Funder can't spend the fee it needs to pay for the commitment transaction:
we were not converting to millisatoshis, however!
This breaks our routeboost test, which no longer has sufficient funds
to make payment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
generate was deprecated some time ago, so we added the generate_block()
helper. But many calls crept back in, and git master refuses it.
(test_blockchaintrack relied on the return value, so make generate_block
return the list of blocks).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
After Ubuntu 18.10 upgrade, lots of new flake8 warnings.
$ flake8 --version:
3.5.0 (mccabe: 0.6.1, pycodestyle: 2.4.0, pyflakes: 1.6.0) CPython 3.6.7rc1 on Linux
Note it seems that W503 warned about line breaks before binary
operators, and W504 complains about them after. I prefer W504, so
disable W503.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was suggested by Pierre-Marie as the solution to the 'same HTLC,
different CLTV' signature mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
My test case is a mainnet gossip store with 22107 channels, and
time to do `lightning-cli listchannels`:
Before: `lightning-cli listchannels` DEVELOPER=0
real 0m1.303000-1.324000(1.3114+/-0.0091)s
After:
real 0m0.629000-0.695000(0.64985+/-0.019)s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And use wallet_forward_status_in_db() everywhere in db code.
And clean up extra CHANGELOG.md entry (looks like rebase error?)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Adapts the `test_forward_stats` test to include checks for the
`forwarded_payments` table. Will add checks for the `listforwardings`
RPC call next.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
Have c-lightning nodes send out the largest value for
`htlc_maximum_msat` that makes sense, ie the lesser of
the peer's max_inflight_htlc value or the total channel
capacity minus the total channel reserve.
There is an issue with the way we retrieve the channel accounting info
that will result in always showing 0 for all stats. This tests for it
and the next commit will fix it.
We have a lot of infrastructure to delay local channel_updates to
avoid spamming on each peer reconnect; we had to keep tracking of
pending ones though, in case we needed the very latest for sending an
error when failing an HTLC.
Instead, it's far simpler to set the local_disabled flag on a channel
when we disconnect, but only send a disabling channel_update if we
actually fail an HTLC.
Note: handle_channel_update() TAKES update (due to tal_arr_dup), but we
didn't use that before. Now we do, add annotation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Manipulate fees via fake-bitcoin-cli. It's not quite the same, as
these are pre-smoothing, so we need a restart to override that where
we really need an exact change. Or we can wait until it reaches a
certain value in cases we don't care about exact amounts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't respond to fee changes until we're locked in: make sure we catch
up at that point.
Note that we use NORMAL fees during opening, but IMMEDIATE after, so
this often sends a fee update. The tests which break, we set those
feerates to be equal.
This (sometimes) changes the behavior of test_permfail, as we now
get an immediate commit, so that is fixed too so we always wait for
that to complete.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When in this state, we send a canned error "Awaiting unilateral close".
We enter this both when we drop to chain, and when we're trying to get
them to drop to chain due to option_data_loss_protect.
As this state (unlike channel errors) is saved to the database, it means
we will *never* talk to a peer again in this state, so they can't
confuse us.
Since we set this state in channel_fail_permanent() (which is the only
place we call drop_to_chain for a unilateral close), we don't need to
save to the db: channel_set_state() does that for us.
This state change has a subtle effect: we return WIRE_UNKNOWN_NEXT_PEER
instead of WIRE_TEMPORARY_CHANNEL_FAILURE as soon as we get a failure
with a peer. To provoke a temporary failure in test_pay_disconnect we
take the node offline.
Reported-by: Christian Decker @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Prior to this, lightningd would hand uninteresting peers back to connectd,
which would then return it to lightningd if it sent a non-gossip msg,
or if lightningd asked it to release the peer.
Now connectd hands the peer to lightningd once we've done the init
handshake, which hands it off to openingd.
This is a deep structural change, so we do the minimum here and cleanup
in the following patches.
Lightningd:
1. Remove peer_nongossip handling from connect_control and peer_control.
2. Remove list of outstanding fundchannel command; it was only needed to
find the race between us asking connectd to release the peer and it
reconnecting.
3. We can no longer tell if the remote end has started trying to fund a
channel (until it has succeeded): it's very transitory anyway so not
worth fixing.
4. We now always have a struct peer, and allocate an uncommitted_channel
for it, though it may never be used if neither end funds a channel.
5. We start funding on messages for openingd: we can get a funder_reply
or a fundee, or an error in response to our request to fund a channel.
so we handle all of them.
6. A new peer_start_openingd() is called after connectd hands us a peer.
7. json_fund_channel just looks through local peers; there are none
hidden in connectd any more.
8. We sometimes start a new openingd just to send an error message.
Openingd:
1. We always have information we need to accept them funding a channel (in
the init message).
2. We have to listen for three fds: peer, gossip and master, so we opencode
the poll.
3. We have an explicit message to start trying to fund a channel.
4. We can be told to send a message in our init message.
Testing:
1. We don't handle some things gracefully yet, so two tests are disabled.
2. 'hand_back_peer .*: now local again' from connectd is no longer a message,
openingd says 'Handed peer, entering loop' once its managing it.
3. peer['state'] used to be set to 'GOSSIPING' (otherwise this field doesn't
exist; 'state' is now per-channel. It doesn't exist at all now.
4. Some tests now need to turn on IO logging in openingd, not connectd.
5. There's a gap between connecting on one node and having connectd on
the peer hand over the connection to openingd. Our tests sometimes
checked getpeers() on the peer, and didn't see anything, so line_graph
needed updating.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
ZmnSCPxj
lisa neigut