We were using the bitcoin genesis blockhash for all networks, which is
not correct, and would result in the open being aborted when talking
to other implementations.
Reported-by: @sstone and @pm47
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We weren't registering reconnecting peers for broadcasts. Just
starting a timer is enough. Also added an integration test to check
that the gossip sync is being resumed.
test_closing_negotiation_reconnect (__main__.LightningDTests) ... peer state CLOSINGD_COMPLETE should be CLOSINGD_SIGEXCHANGE
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a transitional state, while we're waiting to see the
closing tx onchain (which is To Be Implemented).
The simplest way to do re-transmission is to re-use closingd, and just
disallow any updates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I made the mistake of thinking it was a [NUM_SIDES] array, but
it's actually our balance, and it's in millisatoshi. Rename
for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Run one travis build with valgrind on legacy tests, off on new daemon
tests, and another build with the roles switched. Should also speed
this up a bit since we run in parallel.
As tracked down by Christian; by setting up the master conn first,
we make the master fd async. This means that the synchronous read
(in init_channel) can fail with -EAGAIN, and indeed, Christian
saw this when not running under valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We actually don't need to transition if we're reconnecting, and logic
to go to CHANNELD_NORMAL was wrong: we checked that we'd seen funding tx
locked, but not that we'd received a msg from the remote peer.
We need to fix the tests now we no longer double-transition, too.
Fixes: #188
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Important: a non-standard one can make the closing tx not propagate.
Drive-by cut&paste message fix, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is what it actually is, and makes it clearer when we refer to the
spec. It's the commitment we're currently updating, which is the next
commitment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently have the problem that the master can send new HTLCs before
we've processed the incoming reestablish message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell