The current code sends hsmstatus_client_bad_request via the req fd;
this won't work, since lightningd uses that synchronously and only
expects a reply to its commands. So send it via status_conn.
We also enhance hsmstatus_client_bad_request to include details, and
create convenience functions for it. Our previous handling was ad-hoc;
we sometimes just closed on the client without telling lightningd,
and sometimes we didn't tell lightningd *which* client was broken.
Also make every handler the exact same prototype, so they now use the
exact same patterns (hsmd *only* handles requests, makes replies).
I tested this manually by corrupting a request to hsmd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently just ignore them. This is one reason the hsm (in some places)
explicitly calls log_broken so we get some idea.
This was the only subdaemon which had a NULL msgcb and msgname, so eliminate
those checks in subd.c.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Got a spurious failure in test_no_fee_estimate; we fired too soon from the logs (presumably
we raced in on the first response, but estimatesmartfee gets called 3 times).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
this enables addr like --addr=autotor:127.0.0.1 or
--addr=autotor:localhost to just use the default tor service port
Signed-off-by: Saibato <Saibato.naga@pm.me>
- reduces probability for a deadlock where we block on sending data because
the other peer cannot receive because it blocks on sending data etc.
- when either side sends so much data that it fills up the kernel/network buffer
- however sending out gossip can still block when (malicious) peer never receives
The `json_tok_percentage` parser is used for the `fuzzpercent` in `getroute` and
`maxfeepercent` in `pay`. In both cases it seems reasonable to allow values
larger than 100%. This has bitten users in the past when they transferred single
satoshis to things like satoshis.place over a route longer than 2 hops.
With the previous patch, we could still get stuck behind a low-prio
request. Generalize it into separate queues, and allow more than one
request in parallel.
Worth noting that the test time for `VALGRIND=0 pytest -vx tests/ -n 10`
doesn't change measurably.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
fiatjaf has a cheap VPS, connecting remotely to his home bitcoind node.
fiatjaf's latency on bitcoin-cli getblock is between 10 and 37 seconds.
fiatjaf's c-lightning node is getting one block per hour.
fiatjaf is sad.
We single-file our bitcoind requests, because bitcoind has a limited
thread pool and it *fails* rather than queueing if you upset it. We
probably be fine using separate queues for each command type, but simply
allowing some requests to cut in line should prove my theory that we're
getting stuck behind gossip verification requests.
fiatjaf now gets one block per 2 minutes.
fiatjaf is less sad.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a simple reverse proxy that `bitcoin-cli` can talk to when invoked by
`lightningd`. It allows us to trace `bitcoin-cli` calls, and intercept calls to
mock the replies, better than the current bash-script based method.
Everything depends on common headers etc, and the HSM_CLIENT_HEADERS was removed
quite a while ago.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We would never complete further ping commands if we had < responses
than pings. Oops.
Fixes: #1928
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We want to try it before --daemon, in case we error, but we don't know
the pid yet, so we split into 'lock' and 'write'.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we run two daemons on the same directory we'd be getting the failure from
trying to listen to the same file before we'd hit the pid-file error, which was
causing confusion.
Rusty Russell
Saibato
Simon Vrouwe
Christian Decker
arowser
alan8325