During sync it is highly likely that we can coalesce multiple calls and share
results among them. We also report back failures for non-existing blocks early
on, so we don't run into issues with blocks that our bitcoind doesn't have
yet.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This was caused by us not checking against the max_blockheight, but rather the
min_blockheight which can be negative with a newly created node. This is still
safe since we check for duplicates anyway in `wallet_filteredblock_add`.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
1. These days we delete the [Unreleased] tag during rcs.
2. Make sure we test the release build process during rc1, since I
screwed that up last release.
3. Add a section on rc2, etc.
4. Do final release via a github PR, since I screwed that up on the
prior release.
5. Update `tools/build-release.sh` and instructions to show that we now
make a reproducible build for Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Our reproducibile builds use the dirname to get version, but they have
a v in them (the tools/repro-build.sh script gets this right, so I
copied that).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is more reliable under load now: shorten the times so it is
likely to run in a single timeslice, and add a nanosleep so it's
likely to be at the start of the timeslice.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This simplifies the dependencies:
1. Objs depend on headers, not other objs.
2. Programs depend on objs.
3. A .o file will generally implicitly depend on the .c file it's built from.
4. If a file has a build line, it's often better to list all deps there.
5. I spotted some missing 'make clean' files.
The particular problem in this case seems to be that make would use
tools/test/gen_test.c before it was ready. It's probably confused by
the use of recursive make via update-mocks, so explicitly split that
into two stages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Dynamic plugins were keeping fds open; they should not have these
at all anyway, but worse, they interfere with operation because
we don't notice they're closed.
The symptom was that shutdown of the test_plugin_slowinit and
test_plugin_command was 30 seconds (10 seconds grace to kill each daemon).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I don't remember ever seeing a bug which only showed up in VALGRIND=1 with developer
mode disabled, so don't test that, and spread out the other test more evenly.
In addition, disable the worst-performing tests in DEVELOPER=0 mode.
Here timings from my build machine: the worst 6 (- DEVELOPER=0 VALGRIND=0)
with the same tests (+ DEVELOPER=1 VALGRIND=1)
-452.42s call tests/test_pay.py::test_channel_spendable
+87.69s call tests/test_pay.py::test_channel_spendable
-335.66s call tests/test_gossip.py::test_gossip_store_compact_on_load
+47.41s call tests/test_gossip.py::test_gossip_store_compact_on_load
-332.07s call tests/test_connection.py::test_opening_tiny_channel
+89.71s call tests/test_connection.py::test_opening_tiny_channel
-331.97s call tests/test_pay.py::test_channel_spendable_large
+56.23s call tests/test_pay.py::test_channel_spendable_large
-305.28s call tests/test_invoices.py::test_invoice_routeboost
+37.57s call tests/test_invoices.py::test_invoice_routeboost
-284.28s call tests/test_plugin.py::test_htlc_accepted_hook_forward_restart
+49.12s call tests/test_plugin.py::test_htlc_accepted_hook_forward_restart
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is probably worth preventing.
1. Our depth estimate would be inaccurate possibly leading to us
timing out too early.
2. If we're not up-to-date our onchain funds are unknown.
3. We wouldn't be able to send or receive HTLCs until we're synced anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We want to still allow incoming connections, and reestablishment of
channels, but if one tries to give us an HTLC, stall until we're
synced.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we don't know block height, we shouldn't be sending HTLCs. This
stops us forwarding HTLCs as well as new payments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
You're supposed to be able to hand mock_rpc either a function to call,
or a dict canned response. We never did the latter, and the logic
was broken.
It was testing the key, not the value for whether it was a dict. And
it could never have given a valid response anyway, since it wouldn't
know the id to use. So assume it's a successful result.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
trueptolemy
ZmnSCPxj
Sjors Provoost
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Nicolas Dorier
Karl-Johan Alm
lisa neigut
Cryptcoin Junkey