When we get a reconnection, kill the current remote peer, and wait for the
master to tell us it's dead. Then we hand it the new peer.
Previously, we would end up with gossipd holding multiple peers, and
the logging was really hard to interpret; I'm not completely convinced
that we did the right thing when one terminated, either.
Note that this now means we can have peers with neither ->local nor ->remote
populated, so we check that more carefully.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means that openingd and closingd now forward our gossip. But the real
reason we want to do this is that it gives an easy way for gossipd to kill
any active daemon, by closing its fd: previously closingd and openingd didn't
read the fd, so tended not to notice.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
(This was sitting in my gossip-enchancement patch queue, but it simplifies
this set too, so I moved it here).
In 94711969f we added an explicit gossip_index so when gossipd gets
peers back from other daemons, it knows what gossip it has sent (since
gossipd can send gossip after the other daemon is already complete).
This solution is insufficient for the more general case where gossipd
wants to send other messages reliably, so replace it with the other
solution: have gossipd drain the "gossip fd" which the daemon returns.
This turns out to be quite simple, and is probably how I should have
done it originally :(
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We missed it in some corner cases where we crashed/were killed between
being told of the lockin and sending the channel_normal_operation message.
When we were restarted, we were told both sides were locked in already,
so we never updated the state.
Pull the entire "tell channeld" logic into channel_control.c, and make
it clear that we need to keep waching if we cant't tell channeld. I think
we did get this correct in practice, since funding_announce_cb has the
same test, but it's better to be clear.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, the main daemon and subdaemons share the backtrace code,
with hooks for logging.
The daemon hook inserts the io_poll override, which means we no longer
need io_debug.[ch]. Though most daemons don't need it, they still link
against ccan/io, so it's harmess (suggested by @ZmnSCPxj).
This was tested manually to make sure we get backtraces still.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I didn't convert all tests: they can still use a standalone context.
It's just marginally more efficient to share the libwally one for all
our daemons which link against it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we're going to simply take() a pointer, don't allocate it off a random
object. Using NULL makes our intent clear, particularly with allocating
packets we're going to take() onto a queue.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I did a brief audit of tmpctx uses, and we do leak them in various
corner cases. Fortunely, all our daemons are based on some kind of
I/O loop, so it's fairly easy to clean a global tmpctx at that point.
This makes things a bit neater, and slightly more efficient, but also
clearer: I avoided creating a tmpctx in a few places because I didn't
want to add another allocation. With that penalty removed, I can use
it more freely and hopefully write clearer code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This simplifies things, and means it's always in the database. Our
previous approach to creating it on the fly had holes when it was
created for onchaind, causing us to use another every time we
restarted.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For the moment, this just tracks the lockin, announce and shutdown
statuses.
We currently have trouble telling when we're stuck in
CHANNELD_AWAITING_LOCKIN who has sent the transaction.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We always hand in "NULL" (which means use tal_len on the msg), except
for two places which do that manually for no good reason.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Because peer_failed would previously drop the connection, we had a
special 'negotiation_failed' message which made the master hand it
back to gossipd. We don't need that any more.
This also meant we no longer need a special hook in read_peer_msg
for openingd to send this message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Several daemons (onchaind, hsm) want to use the status messages, but
don't communicate with peers. The coming changes made them drag in
more code they didn't need, so instead we have a different
non-overlapping type.
We combine the status_received_errmsg and status_sent_errmsg
into a single status_peer_error, with the presence or not of the
'error_for_them' field indicating direction.
We also rename status_fatal_connection_lost() to
peer_failed_connection_lost() to fit in.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We make it a macro, since everyone uses PEER_FD and GOSSIP_FD constants
(they're actually always the same, but this is slightly safer), and
add a gossip_index arg: this is groundwork for when we want to hand
the peer back to master for gossipd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This avoids clashing with the new_channel we're about to add to lightningd,
and also matches its counterpart new_initial_channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we have wirestring, this is much more natural. And with the
24M length limit, we needn't be so concerned about dumping 64k peer
messages in hex.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These are now logically arrays of pointers. This is much more natural,
and gets rid of the horrible utxo array converters.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to override two methods: the io error (tell gossipd to
disable), and send reply (enqueue, don't write direclty).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, decode error messages correctly and do the right thing with
messages about other channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Right now it allows ping but not pong.
If A sends a ping expecting a pong to B during CHANNELD_AWAITING_LOCKIN,
It would result in
`STATUS_FAIL_PEER_BAD: WIRE_PONG (19) before funding locked`
resulting in a unilateral channel close by A.
Rusty Russell
practicalswift
ZmnSCPxj
rvandermeer
Ephraim Raj