When we clear and recreate ltmp, we attach it to whatever logbook it's on.
This, of course, is fraught, since it may be freed.
We could make it NULL-parented, but that makes YA special-case to free
when we exit (we try to keep valgrind happy by freeing everything). So
since the first log_book is the permanent one attached to lightningd,
just keep that parent when we re-build it after use.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As of version 5.0 Android requires all dynamically linked executables to support PIE. This allows programs to be loaded at a different addresses, making it harder for attackers to target.
Enable with PIE=1
When cross compiling it's important that the resulting config.h reflects the platform we are building for and not the one we are building on.
Otherwise we end up with a config.h that defines headers that are not there on the target platform, wrong endnianness and so on.
The -static flag is there to be able to easily run the configurator test executables on the build machine with qemu-*.
E.g. Without the -static flag the resulting dynamically linked ARM executables complain about the lack of linker (/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so or /system/bin/linker for Android), since these files are not usually available on the build machine building statically avoids this problem and results in a proper config.h for cross compiling.
The more frequent question I ask to myself when initiating channels regards the amount field.
In this document we have three different denominations and the modification proposed aims to address the possible doubts or errors.
The names <amount_in_bitcoins>, <amount_in_satoshis> or <amount_in_millisatoshis> (this last is omitted because the denomination is in the description) are not so elegant but they could serve the purpose.
Because peer_failed would previously drop the connection, we had a
special 'negotiation_failed' message which made the master hand it
back to gossipd. We don't need that any more.
This also meant we no longer need a special hook in read_peer_msg
for openingd to send this message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Several daemons (onchaind, hsm) want to use the status messages, but
don't communicate with peers. The coming changes made them drag in
more code they didn't need, so instead we have a different
non-overlapping type.
We combine the status_received_errmsg and status_sent_errmsg
into a single status_peer_error, with the presence or not of the
'error_for_them' field indicating direction.
We also rename status_fatal_connection_lost() to
peer_failed_connection_lost() to fit in.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We make it a macro, since everyone uses PEER_FD and GOSSIP_FD constants
(they're actually always the same, but this is slightly safer), and
add a gossip_index arg: this is groundwork for when we want to hand
the peer back to master for gossipd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And now we can finally do the db upgrade to remove any OPENINGD
channels once, since we never put them back.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's giant, but it's encapsulating at least. It is called from the wallet
code when loading channels, or from the opening code when converting
an uncommitted_channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use it on the secrets array for the moment, but it's also useful
for remote_shutdown_scriptpubkey, as used in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now any struct channel is a genuine channel, the following fields are
always valid:
1. funding_txid: doesn't need to be a pointer.
2. our_msatoshi: doesn't need to be a pointer.
3. last_sig: doesn't need to be a pointer.
4. channel_info: doesn't need to be a pointer.
In addition, 'last_tx' is always valid.
The main effect is to remove a whole heap of branches from the wallet code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Each peer can have one 'uncommitted' channel, which is in the process
of opening. This is used for openingd, and then on return we convert
it into a full-fledged struct channel and commit it into the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means the caller needs to supply an explicit log to base the
subd log on, and also a callback for error handling.
The callback is kind of ugly, but it gets reworked towards the end
of this series.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Once we rely on the logbook outlasting the peer, we can't refer to the
peer from the logbook function:
Valgrind error file: valgrind-errors.26567
==26567== Invalid read of size 8
==26567== at 0x126297: copy_to_parent_log (peer_control.c:690)
==26567== by 0x11C06B: maybe_print (log.c:253)
==26567== by 0x11C145: logv (log.c:270)
==26567== by 0x11C448: log_ (log.c:319)
==26567== by 0x132951: destroy_subd (subd.c:537)
==26567== by 0x179C19: notify (tal.c:240)
==26567== by 0x17A0CE: del_tree (tal.c:400)
==26567== by 0x17A120: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==26567== by 0x17A4ED: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==26567== by 0x16DEB5: io_close (io.c:443)
==26567== by 0x1328BC: sd_msg_read (subd.c:516)
==26567== by 0x1320AC: read_fds (subd.c:328)
==26567== Address 0x6cf9ca0 is 48 bytes inside a block of size 216 free'd
==26567== at 0x4C30D3B: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==26567== by 0x17A1A9: del_tree (tal.c:421)
==26567== by 0x17A4ED: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==26567== by 0x124B6C: delete_peer (peer_control.c:180)
==26567== by 0x12B369: destroy_uncommitted_channel (peer_control.c:2505)
==26567== by 0x179C19: notify (tal.c:240)
==26567== by 0x17A0CE: del_tree (tal.c:400)
==26567== by 0x17A4ED: tal_free (tal.c:509)
==26567== by 0x12B31E: opening_channel_errmsg (peer_control.c:2496)
==26567== by 0x13243A: handle_peer_error (subd.c:407)
==26567== by 0x1326E4: sd_msg_read (subd.c:472)
==26567== by 0x1320AC: read_fds (subd.c:328)
==26567== Block was alloc'd at
==26567== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==26567== by 0x179C83: allocate (tal.c:250)
==26567== by 0x17A250: tal_alloc_ (tal.c:448)
==26567== by 0x124950: new_peer (peer_control.c:151)
==26567== by 0x12B3EC: new_uncommitted_channel (peer_control.c:2521)
==26567== by 0x12B5C5: peer_accept_channel (peer_control.c:2569)
==26567== by 0x126099: peer_sent_nongossip (peer_control.c:641)
==26567== by 0x113B28: peer_nongossip (gossip_control.c:55)
==26567== by 0x113D9D: gossip_msg (gossip_control.c:144)
==26567== by 0x132783: sd_msg_read (subd.c:487)
==26567== by 0x1320AC: read_fds (subd.c:328)
==26567== by 0x16D1FE: next_plan (io.c:59)
==26567==
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
BackgroundL Each log has a log_book: many logs can share the same one,
as each one can have a separate prefix.
Testing tickled a bug at the end of this series, where subd was
logging to the peer's log_book on shutdown, but the peer was already
freed. We've already had issues with logging while lightningd is
shutting down.
There are times when reference counting really is the right answer,
this seems to be one of them: the 'struct log' share the 'struct
log_book' and the last 'struct log' cleans it up.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we create new entries from wallet_channel_insert(), there's no
need for the branches. And indeed, many wallet functions can be
static.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We derive the seed from this, so it needs to be unique, but using
rowid forced us to put the channel into the db early, before it
was ready.
Instead, use a counter to ensure uniqueness, initialized when we load
existing peers. This doesn't need to touch the database at all.
As we now have only two places where the channel is committed (the
funder and fundee paths), so we create a new explicit
'wallet_channel_insert()' function: 'wallet_channel_save()' now just
updates.
Note that this also fixes some weirdness in
wallet_channels_load_active: we strangely avoided loading channels in
CLOSINGD_COMPLETE (which fortunately was a transient state, so
unlikely anyone hit this). Note that since the lines above already
delete all the OPENINGD channels, we now simply load them all.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Adds a simple check that compares genesis-blockhashes from the
chainparams against the blockhash that the wallet was created
with. The wallet is network specific, so mixing is always a bad idea.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
* Fix dev_setfees to set slow and normal fees correctly.
Due to a bug def_setfees(100, slow=100) would instead set immediate and
normal fees to 100. This behavior has been updated to set fees to
correct values, make the values truly optional as per documentation and
unit test this behavior.
* Fix pay() to set msatoshi, description and risk factor properly
Due to a bug pay(invoice, description='1000') resulted in payment of
1000 msatoshi instead. This was fixed and covered with tests.
* Fix named args in listpayments, listpeers and connect
* Do not pass None to methods where it is default value
* Make description on invoice and pay match.
Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj
* Fix dev_setfees to set slow and normal fees correctly.
Due to a bug def_setfees(100, slow=100) would instead set immediate and
normal fees to 100. This behavior has been updated to set fees to
correct values, make the values truly optional as per documentation and
unit test this behavior.
* Fix pay() to set msatoshi, description and risk factor properly
Due to a bug pay(invoice, description='1000') resulted in payment of
1000 msatoshi instead. This was fixed and covered with tests.
* Fix named args in listpayments, listpeers and connect
* Do not pass None to methods where it is default value
* Make description on invoice and pay match.
Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj
We now keep a list of commands for the jcon instead of a simple
'current' pointer: the assertions become a bit more complex, but
the rest is fairly mechanical.
Fixes: #1007
Reported-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We do a complicated dance because we don't know the current block
height before setting up the topology.
If we're starting at a particular block, we want to go back 100 blocks
before that to cover any reorgs.
If we're not (fresh startup), we still want to go back 100 blocks
because we don't bother handling a reorg which removes all the blocks
we know.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ZmnSCPxj queried the unilateral close case, so make that clearer.
Christian raise concerns about existing channels, so make it clear
what we're doing there too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
practicalswift
Rusty Russell
Igor Cota
libbitc
gabridome
ZmnSCPxj
John Barboza
luca vaccaro
Christian Decker
Anton Astafiev