It would be better to give them unique values, but we don't fully support
db migrate anyway and this is simple (though they will end up using the
same key for multiple channel closes if created before this commit).
Note that even if bip32_max_index is currently unset, it defaults to 0
so it will be found.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The billboard is now far more useful to tell what's going on, and this
gets us closer to a state == owner mapping.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And now we can finally do the db upgrade to remove any OPENINGD
channels once, since we never put them back.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use it on the secrets array for the moment, but it's also useful
for remote_shutdown_scriptpubkey, as used in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We usually did this, but sometimes they were named after what they did,
rather than what they cleaned up.
There are still a few exceptions:
1. I didn't bother creating destroy_xxx wrappers for htable routines
which already existed.
2. Sometimes destructors really are used for side-effects (eg. to simply
mark that something was freed): these are clearer with boutique names.
3. Generally destructors are static, but they don't need to be: in some
cases we attach a destructor then remove it later, or only attach
to *some* cases. These are best with qualifiers in the destroy_<type>
name.
Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need these to decode any returned errors.
We remove it from struct pay_command too, and load directly from db
when we need it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We should be saving this, as it's our proof of payment. Also, we return
it if they try to pay again.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is necessary to grad the their_unilateral/to-us outputs since
they aren't being harvested by `onchaind`
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We save location where transaction was started, in case we try to nest.
There's now no error case; db_exec_mayfail() is the only one.
This means the tests need to override fatal() if they want to intercept
these errors.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
we should never be doing two startups at once, but why take chances? Plus,
we can then assert that all db calls are in transactions.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise we find ourselves outside a commitment. This is a bandaid
until we remove nested commitments again at the end of this series.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Nesting is provided by only actually performing the outermost
transaction and simulating the nested ones. This still allows us to
ensure on lower levels that we are in the context of a transaction
without having to resort to keeping explicitly track of it in the
calling code.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Rusty Russell
practicalswift
ZmnSCPxj
Christian Decker
Igor Cota