I was working on rewriting our (somewhat chaotic) tx watching code
for 0.7.2, when I found this bug: we don't always notice the funding
tx in corner cases where more than one block is detected at
once.
This is just the one commit needed to fix the problem: it has some
unnecessary changes, but I'd prefer not to diverge too far from my
cleanup-txwatch branch.
Fixes: #2352
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we ever do this, we'd end up with an unspendable commitment tx anyway.
It might be able to happen if we have htlcs added from the non-fee-paying
party while the fees are increased, though. But better to close the
channel and get a report about it if that happens.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We used to produce these, but they're invalid. When we switched to
libwally it (correctly) refuses to get a txid for them.
Fixes: #2772Fixes: #2759
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Due to API instability we are disabling the RPC method for this release, but
will re-enable it after the release again.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
Rewriting the gossip_store is much more trivial when we don't have
any pointers into it, so add some simple offline compaction code
and disable the automatic compaction code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The crashes in #2750 are mostly caused by us trying to partially truncate
the store. The simplest fix for release is to discard the whole thing if
we detect a problem.
This is a workaround: it'd be far nicer to try to recover.
Fixes: #2750
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We hit the timestamp assert on #2750; it shouldn't happen, but crashing
doesn't leave much information.
Reported-by: @m-schmook
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It wasn't invalid due to a missing channel_update, but in fact was a
bad checksum due to a cut & paste bug. Fix that, and assert it's not
actually truncating.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This happened on Travis, and the gossip_store was a suspicious 4096
bytes long. This implies they're using some non-atomic filesystem
(gossipd always does atomic writes to gossip_store), but if they are,
others surely are too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If something went wrong and there was an old one, we were
appending to it!
Reported-by: @SimonVrouwe
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs this in compat mode to detect old (pre-0.6.3) end of JSON.
But it always does the first command in compat mode.
This was never really reliable, since the first command could be to
a plugin for which we simply pass through the JSON (though, carefully
appending the expected '\n\n' if not already there).
Reported-by: @laanwj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We might have channel_announcements which have no channel_update: normally
these don't get written into the store until there is one, but if the
store was truncated it can happen. We then get upset on compaction, since
we don't have an in-memory representation of the channel_announcement.
Similarly, we leave the node_announcement pending until after that
channel_announcement, leading to a similar case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can't continue, since we've moved the indexes. We'll just crash
anyway, as seen from bugs #2742 and #2743.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We catch node_announcements for nodes where we haven't finished
analyzing the channel_announcement yet (either because we're still
checking UTXO, or in this case, because we're waiting for a channel_update).
But we reference count the pending_node_announce, so if we have
multiple channels pending, we might try to insert it twice. Clear it
so this doesn't happen.
There's a second bug where we continue to catch node_announcements
until *all* the channel_announcements are no longer pending; this is fixed
by removing it from the map.
Fixes: #2735
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
That was changed to start the response object, which broke the openingd
code once we merged.
Of course, I should have *renamed it* when I changed the semantic!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Compile broke because we were using low-level JSON primitives here
(which, incidentally, would produce bad JSON now, since we can't just
put a raw string inside an object!).
Use json_add_string, which also has the benefit of escaping JSON
for us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Big wiring re-org for funding-continue
In openingd, we move the 'persistent' state (their basepoints,
pubkey, and the minimum_depth requirement for the opening tx) into
the state object. We also look to keep code-reuse between
'continue' and normal 'fundchannel' as high as possible. Both
of these call the same 'fundchannel_reply' at the end.
In opening_control.c, we remap fundchannel_reply such that it is
now aware of the difference between an external/internally funded
channel open. It's the same return path, with the difference that
one finishes making and broadcasting the funding transaction; the
other is skips this.
Add an RPC method (not working at the moment) called
`fundchannel_continue` that takes as its parameters a
node_id and a txid for a transaction (that ostensibly has an output
for a channel)
Some channels won't be opened with a wtx struct, so keep
the total funding amount separate from it so we can
show some stats for listpeers.
Note that we're going to need to update/confirm this once
the transaction gets confirmed.
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Jorge Timón
lisa neigut
darosior