We need this later, to generate its seed. When we switch to lnd's key system,
we'll only need this, and not peerid.
Note also that the peerid is not just for messages any more, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Often we only need a single secret, so it's clearer to have routines
to do just that. When we change to the lnd key scheme, there will be
no benefit in calculating them all together.
This also adds a test!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use 'our_commit' for the commit we sign (ie. the remote commitment tx),
and vice versa. Use local/remote nomenclature.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Well, it's generated by shachain, so technically it is a sha256, but
that's an internal detail. It's a secret.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We already work around this by using an array with a 0/1 length convention,
but better to be explicit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I could not figure out why test_announce_address suddenly stopped working:
I had previously been using DEVELOPER=1 on the cmdline for historical
reasons when testing locally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- fixes problem with polling interval > 150 * 0.9
- fixes log message 'feerate hit floor' at every feerate change
- smoothed fee now reaches 90% of (exp weighted) fee estimates polled in last
120s, independent of polling interval
- only apply smoothing when effect > 10 percent so it doesn't correct forever
- fix indentation
This is a cosmetic change only. No functional changes.
I shortened the names of macros and changed param_parse() to param().
Also went through params.h with a fine-toothed comb and updated the comments
to reflect the current API.
I wanted to change the files:
params.c -> param.c
params.h -> param.h
run-params.c -> run->param.c
but that confused `git diff` for params.h so its best left for another PR.
I'm keeping #1682 updated locally with all these changes.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
@wythe points out that many cases want a default value, not NULL.
Nicer to do it in the param_parse() call.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I'm not completely convinced that it's only ever set to a failcode
with the BADONION bit set, especially after the previous patches in
this series. Now that channeld can handle arbitrary failcodes passed
this way, simply rename it.
We add marshalling assertions that only one of failcode and failreason
is set, and we unmarshal an empty 'fail' to NULL (just the the
generated unmarshalling code does).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
None of these sanity checks should fail, but let's be thorough: we
were testing for htlc->fail but not failcode when fulfilling an HTLC.
The failing-htlc case had this correct already.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
'struct htlc' in channeld has a 'malformed' field, which is really only
used in the "retransmit updates on reconnect" case. That's quite confusing,
and I'm not entirely convinced that it can only be set to a failcode
with the BADONION bit set.
So generalize it, using the same logic we use in the master daemon:
failcode: a locally generated error, for channeld to turn into the appropriate
error message.
fail: a remotely generated onion error, for forwarding.
Either of these being non-zero/non-NULL means we've failed, and only one
should be set at any time.
We unify the "send htlc fail/fulfill update due to retransmit" and the
normal send update paths, by always calling send_fail_or_fulfill.
This unification revealed that we accidentally skipped the
onion-wrapping stage when we retransmit failed htlcs!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
==1224== Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
==1224== at 0x152CAD: memcheck_ (mem.h:247)
==1224== by 0x152D18: towire (towire.c:17)
==1224== by 0x152DA1: towire_u16 (towire.c:28)
==1224== by 0x142189: towire_failed_htlc (htlc_wire.c:29)
==1224== by 0x16343F: towire_channel_init (gen_channel_wire.c:596)
==1224== by 0x115C2C: peer_start_channeld (channel_control.c:249)
==1224== by 0x131701: peer_connected (peer_control.c:503)
==1224== by 0x117820: gossip_msg (gossip_control.c:182)
==1224== by 0x139D97: sd_msg_read (subd.c:500)
==1224== by 0x139676: read_fds (subd.c:327)
==1224== by 0x179D52: next_plan (io.c:59)
==1224== by 0x17A84F: do_plan (io.c:387)
==1224== Address 0x1ffefffabe is on thread 1's stack
==1224== in frame #2, created by towire_u16 (towire.c:26)
Followed by:
2018-06-18T21:53:04.129Z lightningd(1224): 03933884aaf1d6b108397e5efe5c86bcf2d8ca8d2f700eda99db9214fc2712b134 chan #1: Peer permanent failure in CHANNELD_NORMAL: lightning_channeld: received ERROR channel d0101486543e1a8b6871556a4fe1fba4ad4d83ce7f6f92919fd17bd1545d2fd5: UpdateFailMalformedHtlc message doesn't have BADONION bit set
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
typesafe_cb isn't suitable here, as it is simply a conditional cast,
and the result is passed through '...' and doesn't matter.
Reported-by: @wythe
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We weren't waiting for gossipd to actually process the
dev_set_max_scids_encode_size message, so under Travis it sometimes
split the reply before processing that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Note that we mark both directions of the channel disabled immediately,
it's just the broadcast of the update which is delayed, just like the
ones generated when channeld tells us to.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We disable the channel every time the peer disconnects; if it reconnects
we get two updates.
The simplest solution: delay all updates by 15 seconds. Replace any
pending delayed update. If update is redundant after 15 seconds,
discard.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In this test we tell l3 to disconnect on sending WIRE_CHANNEL_ANNOUNCEMENT.
This is hit by gossipd (to disconnect from l2) but *also* channeld to
disconnect from l4. That's OK, because normally by this point l4 has
sent its real channel_update.
However, the next patch introduces a delay in sending channel_updates,
meaning l4 hasn't sent it yet. If l3 doesn't reconnect to l4, we
never get the channel_update and the test which expects l1 to eventually
see both sides of the channel fails.
So we manually reconnect then. Note that we remove the redundant
'dev-no-reconnect' option from l2: it's added automatically as it
doesn't set 'may_reconnect'.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This doesn't do anything for us now, since we actually tend to produce
DISABLE/ENABLE update pairs. But the infrastructure is useful for the
next patch.
We also add more details to the trace message in the core update code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
json_listpeers returns an array of peers, and an array of nodes: the latter
is a subset of the former, and is used for printing alias/color information.
This changes it so there is a 1:1 correspondance between the peer information
and nodes, meaning no more O(n^2) search.
If there is no node_announce for a peer, we use a negative timestamp
(already used to indicate that the rest of the gossip_getnodes_entry
is not valid).
Other fixes:
1. Use get_node instead of iterating through the node map.
2. A node without addresses is perfectly valid: we have to use the timestamp
to see if the alias/color are set. Previously we wouldn't print that
if it didn't also advertize an address.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There doesn't seeem to be a need for this anymore (unless I'm missing something).
I added the sendpay_nulltok() unit test to confirm.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
@rustyrussell showed we don't need temporary objects for params.
This means params no longer need a tal context.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
@wythe points out we don't need to keep the around now param_is_set()
is removed. We can in fact go further and avoid marshalling them into
temporary objects at the caller altogether.
This means internally we have an array of struct param, rather than an
array of 'struct param *', which causes most of the noise in this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're using a macro anyway, so appending "" make it a compile-time check.
Complicates testing a bit, since we actually use generated names there.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Hiroki Gondo
Mark Beckwith
Christian Decker
Bertrand Marlier
SimonVrouwe
arowser
gallizoltan
Jonathan Zernik
William Casarin