@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Discussion of how we should probably just add more Buffer methods to core.
Bert: there’s another aspect of this. At some point Node was really modern, but we’ve fallen behind. We can’t even get HTTP/2 or web sockets, we’re in trouble.
Bert: there’s another aspect of this. At some point Node was really modern, but we’ve fallen behind. We can’t even get HTTP/2 or web sockets, we’re in trouble.
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to user-land code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to userland code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
Trevor: I would like the infrastructure for HTTP/2 to be similar to HTTP/1, with http-parser etc.
Trevor: I would like the infrastructure for HTTP/2 to be similar to HTTP/1, with http-parser etc.
@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ Ben: is there any reason HTTP/2 couldn’t be done in pure JS?
Discussion of http-parser and current HTTP/1 implementation strategy and speed.
Discussion of http-parser and current HTTP/1 implementation strategy and speed.
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some user-land ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some userland ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a user-land HTTP/2 module?
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a userland HTTP/2 module?
Discussion of how Fedor already has a SPDY implementation.
Discussion of how Fedor already has a SPDY implementation.