Turn off -Werror when building V8, it hits -Werror=unused-local-typedefs
with g++ 4.8. The warning itself is harmless so don't abort the build.
This was originally implemented in commit d2ab314e back in 2011 but the
build process has gone through a few iterations since then, that change
no longer works.
Fix the following valgrind warning:
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x7D64E7: v8::internal::GlobalHandles::IterateAllRootsWithClassIds(v8::internal::ObjectVisitor*) (global-handles.cc:613)
by 0x94DCDC: v8::internal::NativeObjectsExplorer::FillRetainedObjects() (profile-generator.cc:2849)
# etc.
This was fixed upstream in r12903 and released in 3.15.2 but that commit
was never back-ported to the 3.14 branch that node.js v0.10 uses.
The code itself works okay; this commit simply shuffles the clauses in
an `if` statement to check that the node is in use before checking its
class id (which is uninitialized if the node is not in use.)
When sending a socket to a child process via IPC pipe,
`child_process.js` picks a raw UV handle from `_handle` property, sends
it, and assigns `null` to the property. Sending the same socket twice
was resulting in a runtime error, since we weren't handling the empty
`_handle` case.
In case of `null` `_handle` we should send just a plain text message
as passed it was passed to `.send()` and ignore the handle, letting
users handle such cases themselves instead of throwing the error at
runtime.
fix#5469
It's currently not really possible to compile native add-ons with
-fvisibility=hidden because that also hides the struct containing
the module definition.
The NODE_MODULE() and NODE_MODULE_DECL() macros are structured in
a way that makes it impossible to add a visibility attribute manually
so there is no escape hatch there.
That's why this commit adds an explicit visibility attribute to
the module definition. It doesn't help with node.js releases that
are already out there but at least it improves the situation going
forward.
If two timers run on the same tick, and the first timer uses a domain,
and then catches an exception and disposes of the domain, then the
second timer never runs. (And even if the first timer does not dispose
of the domain, the second timer could run under the wrong domain.)
This happens because timer.js uses "process.nextTick()" to schedule
continued processing of the timers for that tick. However, there was
an exception inside a domain, then "process.nextTick()" runs under
the domain of the first timer function, and will do nothing if
the domain has been disposed.
To avoid this, we temporarily save the value of "process.domain"
before calling nextTick so that it does not run inside any domain.
Previously if you cached process.nextTick and then require('domain')
subsequent nextTick() calls would not be caught because enqueued
functions were taking the wrong path. This keeps nextTick to a single
function reference and changes the implementation details after domain
has been required.
This makes it so that the user may pass in a
`createConnection()` option, and they don't have
to pass `agent: false` at the same time.
Also adding a test for the `createConnection` option,
since none was in place before.
See #7014.
Ensure that the behavior of `assert.deepEqual` does not depend on
argument ordering when comparing an `arguments` object with a
non-`arguments` object.
The reason this wasn't working was because after restart, when restoring
breakpoints the scripts wasn't loaded, so the breakpoint.script was
undefined. As a fix I added another check to use breakpoint.scriptReq
instead of breakpoint.script, which is the same except when the
breakpoint is a function.
fixes#7027
Don't use argument as callback if it's not a valid callback function.
Throw a valid exception instead explaining the issue. Adds to #7070
("DNS — Throw meaningful error(s)").
Update the list of root certificates in src/node_root_certs.h with
tools/mk-ca-bundle.pl and update src/node_crypto.cc to make use of
the new format.
Fixes#6013.
Original commit message:
VS2013 contains a number of improvements, most notably the addition
of all C99 math functions.
I'm a little bit concerned about the change I had to make in
cpu-profiler.cc, but I spent quite a bit of time looking at it and was
unable to figure out any rational explanation for the warning. It's
possible it's spurious. Since it seems like a useful warning in
general though, I chose not to disable globally at the gyp level.
I do think someone with expertise here should probably try to
determine if this is a legitimate warning.
BUG=288948
R=dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23449035
NOTE: Path applied without `cpu-profiler.cc` changes because in our
version it was looking totally different.
Ben Noordhuis
Shuhei Kagawa
Fedor Indutny
Benoit Vallée
Greg Brail
Timothy J Fontaine
Nathan Rajlich
Mike Pennisi
Brian White
Nicolas Talle
Anton Khlynovskiy
Pedro Ballesteros
Raynos
Farid Neshat
isaacs
Christian
Kenan Sulayman
iamdoron
Benjamin Waters
Maxime Quandalle