@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ Yes. See [conditionally firing an effect](/docs/hooks-reference.html#conditional
Generally speaking, no.
Generally speaking, no.
```js{3,8}
```js{3,8}
function Example() {
function Example({ someProp }) {
function doSomething() {
function doSomething() {
console.log(someProp);
console.log(someProp);
}
}
@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ function Example() {
It's difficult to remember which props or state are used by functions outside of the effect. This is why **usually you'll want to declare functions needed by an effect *inside* of it.** Then it's easy to see what values from the component scope that effect depends on:
It's difficult to remember which props or state are used by functions outside of the effect. This is why **usually you'll want to declare functions needed by an effect *inside* of it.** Then it's easy to see what values from the component scope that effect depends on: